ArticleBMC psychology2024
Effective and ineffective psychological adjustment in breast cancer patients before receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy: insights from a cohort study.
Article in BMC psychology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe timing of a breast cancer (BC) diagnosis has a significant psychological impact on patients. However, it reported that those eligible for treatment regimens based on neoadjuvant chemotherapy may experience high levels of depression, anxiety and distress. To cope with this situation, patients deploy psychological coping strategies. The aim of this study is to explore effective and ineffective psychological adjustment mobilized by Moroccan patients newly diagnosed with BC and before receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy, as well as to identify their associations to socio-demographic and clinical determinants. MATERIALS AND
methodsA total of 209 patients were recruited in outpatient in oncology department in the public oncology hospital of Fez city, between 2021 and 2023. Ethics approval was obtained for this study and patients has signed an informed consent form. The questionnaire interview included socio-economic and clinical variables and the Arabic version of Mini-Mental Adjustment to Cancer (Mini-MAC) scale, which measures the strategies of mental adjustment to disease, as fighting spirit (FS), hopelessness/helplessness (HH), anxious preoccupations (AP), cognitive avoidance (CA), fatalism (FA), "maladaptive coping" and "adaptive coping". Bivariate analysis of psychological adjustment strategies and sociodemographic and clinical variables was carried out using statistical tests according to the nature of the variables, to their normality and the homogeneity of their variances. Univariate and multivariate linear regression modelling was carried out using a forward "enter" regression procedure.
resultsA mean age of 47.43 ± 9.45 was found among participants. Assessment of mental adjustment to cancer using Mini-MAC scores revealed that psychological adjustment strategies with a higher mean score were FA, FS and "adaptive coping" strategies. Based mainly on multiple linear Regression, monthly family income was negatively associated with HH, and FS and positively linked to FA and "adaptive coping" strategies. Moreover, the left side as BC laterality was negatively associated with AP and "maladaptive coping" strategies. Furthermore, positive ER status was negatively associated with HH and "maladaptive coping" strategies and high Ki-67 levels were positively linked to AP.
conclusionPrograms to strengthen psychological adjustment in patients with BC candidates for NACT, taking into consideration the determinants found associated in this study, are of great importance since the first oncology consultation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.