ArticleJournal of cheminformatics2024
Suitability of large language models for extraction of high-quality chemical reaction dataset from patent literature.
Article in Journal of cheminformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Transforming Molecular Synthesis With Large Language Models.Chemistry (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026Review
- RelAgent: a multi-agent solution for molecular relationship grounding.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- ReactionSeek: LLM-powered literature data mining and knowledge discovery in organic synthesis.Nature communications · 2026Article
- General-Purpose Models for the Chemical Sciences: LLMs and Beyond.Chemical reviews · 2026Review
- Application and Prospects of Large Language Models in Small-Molecule Drug Discovery.Analytical chemistry · 2025Review
- Advanced machine learning for innovative drug discovery.Journal of cheminformatics · 2025Article
- Implementation of an open chemistry knowledge base with a Semantic Wiki.Journal of cheminformatics · 2025Article
- Leveraging Prompt Engineering in Large Language Models for Accelerating Chemical Research.ACS central science · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With the advent of artificial intelligence (AI), it is now possible to design diverse and novel molecules from previously unexplored chemical space. However, a challenge for chemists is the synthesis of such molecules. Recently, there have been attempts to develop AI models for retrosynthesis prediction, which rely on the availability of a high-quality training dataset. In this work, we explore the suitability of large language models (LLMs) for extraction of high-quality chemical reaction data from patent documents. A comparative study on the same set of patents from an earlier study showed that the proposed automated approach can enhance the current datasets by addition of 26% new reactions. Several challenges were identified during reaction mining, and for some of them alternative solutions were proposed. A detailed analysis was also performed wherein several wrong entries were identified in the previously curated dataset. Reactions extracted using the proposed pipeline over a larger patent dataset can improve the accuracy and efficiency of synthesis prediction models in future.Scientific contributionIn this work we evaluated the suitability of large language models for mining a high-quality chemical reaction dataset from patent literature. We showed that the proposed approach can significantly improve the quantity of the reaction database by identifying more chemical reactions and improve the quality of the reaction database by correcting previous errors/false positives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.