ArticleBreast cancer research : BCR2024
Longitudinal history of mammographic breast density and breast cancer risk by familial risk, menopausal status, and initial mammographic density level in a high risk cohort: a nested case-control study.
Article in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessing mammographic density change within individuals across screening rounds using deep learning-based software.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2025Article
- Longitudinal changes in mammographic density and reproductive hormones during the menopausal transition in middle-aged Korean women: effect modification by obesity.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2025Article
- Validation of a Dynamic Risk Prediction Model Incorporating Prior Mammograms in a Diverse Population.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- Mammographic density by time and breast: a retrospective cohort study from BreastScreen Norway.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2025Article
- Personalized screening based on risk and density: prevalence data from the RIBBS study.La Radiologia medica · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundElevated mammographic density is associated with increased breast cancer risk. However, the contribution of longitudinal changes in mammographic density to breast cancer risk beyond initial mammographic density levels, considering familial breast cancer risk and menopausal status, remains uncertain but holds important clinical implications.
methodsIn a nested case-control study within the Sister Study (323 cases, 899 controls; 12,095 mammograms), a cohort enriched for family history of breast cancer, we examined case-control status in relation to the largest annual change in percent density and dense area using mammograms available spanning 5.4 years, on average, using multivariable logistic regression and to the rate of mammographic density change using linear mixed-effects models. We considered effect modification by: mammographic density level of the earlier mammogram, the extent of family history, Breast and Ovarian Analysis of Disease Incidence and Carrier Estimation (BOADICEA) risk strata, and menopausal status.
resultsCases (diagnosed < 60 years) had greater initial percent density and dense area levels and a slower rate of decline in dense area than controls. Women with stable mammographic density (≤ 10% annual change) had an increased breast cancer risk as compared with women whose largest mammographic density change was > 10% annual decline (e.g., Odds Ratio (OR) 2.34, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 1.63-3.37 for dense area). Increasing vs. decreasing dense area was also associated with elevated risk, especially in women with the highest dense area levels at the earlier mammogram (OR: 2.56, 95%CI 1.50-4.36). Although generally similar across menopausal and familial risk categories, the associations of MD change with risk appeared stronger in pre-menopausal and lower-risk women.
conclusionsWomen who maintain higher levels of mammographic density (i.e. do not decrease over time) or have increasing mammographic density over time have a higher risk of subsequent breast cancer than women with high mammographic density that decreases over time. These findings suggest potential for incorporating mammographic density trajectories in clinical risk assessment, and the importance of additional breast cancer monitoring in women not experiencing declines in mammographic density over time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.