Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39593128›Full record

SynthesisActa neuropathologica communications2024

Homozygous CDKN2A/B deletions in low- and high-grade glioma: a meta-analysis of individual patient data and predictive values of p16 immunohistochemistry testing.

Darius Noack, Johannes Wach, Alonso Barrantes-Freer, Nils H Nicolay, Erdem Güresir, Clemens Seidel

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Acta neuropathologica communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Multidisciplinary consensus recommendations for the management of IDH-mutant grade 2 gliomas in Spain: a Delphi study.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Article
  4. Chromosomal Instability Drives Glioblastoma Heterogeneity and Therapeutic Opportunities.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Loss ofJournal of Cancer · 2026
    Article
  11. Review
  12. DNA Methylation and Transcript Variant Analysis ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Darius Noack *Department of Radiation Oncology, University Leipzig Medical Center, Stephanstraße 9a, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
Johannes Wach *Department of Neurosurgery, University Leipzig Medical Center, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
Alonso Barrantes-FreerPaul-Flechsig Institute of Neuropathology, University Leipzig Medical Center, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
Nils H NicolayDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Leipzig Medical Center, Stephanstraße 9a, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
Erdem GüresirDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Leipzig Medical Center, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
Clemens SeidelDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Leipzig Medical Center, Stephanstraße 9a, 04103, Leipzig, Germany. clemens.seidel@medizin.uni-leipzig.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

CDKN2A/B deletions are prognostically relevant in low- and high-grade gliomas. Data on this is derived from heterogeneous series, an accurate estimation of survival risk from homozygous CDKN2A/B deletion is missing. Besides genetic testing, p16-immunohistochemistry (IHC) as a less cost intensive means for indirect detection of CDKN2A/B alterations is possible but not validated in larger datasets. The present meta-analysis aimed to (1) reconstruct individual patient data (IPD) and estimate overall survival (OS) stratified by CDKN2A/B status from all literature and to (2) determine accuracy of p16 testing for CDKNA2/B detection from published studies. For survival analysis according to CDKN2A/B status 460 records were screened, four articles with 714 participants were included. In IDH-wildtype (IDH-wt) gliomas, 57.07% harbored the deletion compared to 9.76% in IDH-mutant (IDH-mut) gliomas. Median OS of patients with IDH-wt gliomas and homozygous CDKN2A/B deletion was 13.0 months compared to 18.0 months with non-deleted CDKN2A/B (p = 0.014, Log-Rank). With homozygous deletion of CDKN2A/B the risk of death was increased by 1.5 (95%-CI 1.1-2.1). Median OS in patients with IDH-mut gliomas without CDKN2A/B deletion was 92.0 months compared to 40.0 months with CDKN2A/B deletion (p < 0.001, Log-Rank). CDKN2A/B deletions were associated with a significantly shorter OS (HR = 3.2; 95%-CI 2.2-5.5). For p16 IHC analysis, 10 eligible studies with 1087 examined samples were included. The cut-off for retention differed between the studies. In 588/662 p16 retained cases CDKN2A/B deletions was not detected, implying a negative predictive value (NPV) of p16 staining of 88.8%. Conversely, 279/425 p16 absent cases showed a CDKN2A/B deletion resulting in a positive predictive value (PPV) of 65.6%. Sensitivity of p16 staining for CDKN2A/B detection was 79.0%, specificity 80.1%. Highest diagnostic accuracy of p16 IHC was reached with a cut-off of > 5% and within IDH-mut glioma.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsCyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p15Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p16GliomaGene DeletionHomozygoteHumansImmunohistochemistryNeoplasm GradingPredictive Value of TestsCDKN2A protein, humanCDKN2B protein, humanCyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p15Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p16CDKN2A/BGliomaIndividual patient dataMeta-analysisOverall survivalp16

Identifiers

PMID39593128
PMCPMC11590270

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.