Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39593104›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2024

Improving medication safety for intensive care patients transitioning to a hospital ward: development of a theory-informed intervention package.

Richard S Bourne, Mark Jeffries, Jennifer K Jennings, Darren M Ashcroft, Paul Norman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Richard S BourneDepartments of Pharmacy and Critical Care, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Herries Road, Sheffield, UK. richard.bourne1@nhs.net.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0893-525X
Mark JeffriesDivision of Pharmacy & Optometry, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6882-0350
Jennifer K JenningsDepartments of Pharmacy and Critical Care, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Herries Road, Sheffield, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9679-7701
Darren M AshcroftDivision of Pharmacy & Optometry, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2958-915X
Paul NormanDepartment of Psychology, University of Sheffield, Portobello, Sheffield, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5892-0470

Funding

National Institute for Health and Care Research NIHR300444National Institute for Health and Care Research, Greater Manchester Patient Safety Research Collaboration NIHR204295
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCare of critically ill patients is complex, requiring effective collaboration co-ordination and communication across care teams and professions. Medicines are a fundamental component of the acute interventions intensive care unit (ICU) patients receive, requiring frequent review and optimisation according to patient needs. ICU patients recovering to transfer to a hospital ward are at risk of medication transition errors, contributing to poorer patient and health-system outcomes. We aimed to develop of a theory-informed intervention package to improve medication safety for ICU patients transferring to a hospital ward.

methodsWe conducted a qualitative study comprising two UK face-to-face focus group meetings in April and May 2022. There were ten participants in each meeting (7-8 healthcare professionals and 2-3 patient and public representatives). Each meeting had four foci: (i) What needs to change (intervention targets)? (ii) What are the core intervention components? (iii) What will the intervention components change and how (mechanisms of action), and what key outcomes will the changes impact on? (iv) What are the barriers and facilitators to intervention delivery? A background to the problem and previous intervention development work was provided. Meetings were digitally recorded and transcribed verbatim. Iterative analyses, informed by the Behaviour Change Wheel framework, were conducted to provide a behavioural diagnosis, identify key behaviour change techniques and outline the mechanisms of action through which the intervention might impact on key outcome.

resultsWe identified what needs to change to improve medication safety for UK ICU patients on this care transition. A theory-informed intervention package was developed, based on seven core intervention components (e.g., medication review (targeted), task organisation and prioritisation). For each intervention component the mechanism of action, targeted change, and key outcomes were identified (e.g., medication review (targeted); action planning; decreases problematic polypharmacy; decreased preventable adverse drug events). Barriers and facilitators to intervention component delivery were described.

conclusionsWe developed a theory-informed core intervention package to address the limitations in medication safety for ICU patients transferring to a hospital ward. Understanding what needs to change, and the accompanying facilitators provides a basis for intervention feasibility testing and refinement prior to future evaluation of effectiveness.

Indexed as

Focus GroupsIntensive Care UnitsMedication ErrorsPatient SafetyQualitative ResearchHumansPatient TransferQuality ImprovementUnited KingdomCritical careMedication safetyTransfers in care

Identifiers

PMID39593104
PMCPMC11600792

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.