Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39593094›Full record

ReviewJournal of ovarian research2024

Unraveling the complexity of follicular fluid: insights into its composition, function, and clinical implications.

Yurong Pan, Chenyu Pan, Chunping Zhang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of ovarian research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Diagnosis-dependent metabolic reprogramming of follicular fluid.Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yurong PanNanchang University Queen Mary School, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, 330031, China.
Chenyu PanThe First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450052, China.
Chunping ZhangSchool of Basic Medical Sciences, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, 330019, China. zhangchunping@ncu.edu.cn.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 32160176
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Follicular fluid (FF) plays a vital role in the bidirectional communication between oocytes and granulosa cells (GCs), regulating and promoting oocyte growth and development. This fluid constitutes a complex microenvironment, rich in various molecules including hormones, growth factors, cytokines, lipids, proteins, and extracellular vesicles. Understanding the composition and metabolic profile of follicular fluid is important for investigating ovarian pathologies such as polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) and endometriosis. Additionally, analyzing follicular fluid can offer valuable insights into oocyte quality, aiding in optimal oocyte selection for in vitro fertilization (IVF). This review provides an overview of follicular fluid composition, classification of its components and discusses the influential components of oocyte development. It also highlights the role of follicular fluid in the pathogenesis and diagnosis of ovarian diseases, along with potential follicular fluid biomarkers for assessing oocyte quality. By understanding the intricate relationship between follicular fluid and oocyte development, we can advance fertility research and improve clinical outcomes for infertility patients.

Indexed as

Follicular FluidBiomarkersFemaleFertilization in VitroGranulosa CellsHumansOocytesPolycystic Ovary SyndromeBiomarkersEndometriosisFollicular fluidHuman ovaryIn vitro fertilizationOocytePolycystic ovary syndrome

Identifiers

PMID39593094
PMCPMC11590415

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.