ArticleGenome medicine2024
Genome-aware annotation of CRISPR guides validates targets in variant cell lines and enhances discovery in screens.
Article in Genome medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Targeting epigenetic regulators induces transcription-replication conflicts to overcome ATR inhibitor resistance.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- Targeting Non-Coding RNAs as a Potential Therapeutic and Delivery Strategy Against Neurodegenerative Diseases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Targeting Non-coding RNAs in Neurodegeneration: Advances in Therapeutic RNA Modalities and Next-Gen Delivery Technologies.Current Alzheimer research · 2026Review
- WEE1 inhibitors synergise with mRNA translation defects via activation of the kinase GCN2.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Genetic Diversity and Mutation Frequency Databases in Ethnic Populations: Systematic Review.JMIR bioinformatics and biotechnology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCRISPR-Cas9 technology has revolutionised genetic screens and can inform on gene essentiality and chemo-genetic interactions. It is easily deployed and widely supported with many pooled CRISPR libraries available commercially. However, discrepancies between the reference genomes used in the design of those CRISPR libraries and the cell line under investigation can lead to loss of signal or introduction of bias. The problem is particularly acute when dealing with variant cell lines such as cancer cell lines.
resultsHere, we present an algorithm, EXOme-guided Re-annotation of nuCleotIde SEquences (Exorcise), which uses sequence search to detect and correct mis-annotations in CRISPR libraries. Exorcise verifies the presence of CRISPR targets in the target genome and applies corrections to CRISPR libraries using existing exome annotations. We applied Exorcise to re-annotate guides in pooled CRISPR libraries available on Addgene and found that libraries designed on a more permissive reference sequence had more mis-annotations. In simulated CRISPR screens, we modelled common mis-annotations and found that they adversely affect discovery of hits in the intermediate range. We then confirmed this by applying Exorcise on datasets from Dependency Map (DepMap) and the DNA Damage Response CRISPR Screen Viewer (DDRcs), where we found improved discovery power upon Exorcise while retaining the strongest hits.
conclusionsPooled CRISPR libraries map guide sequences to genes and these mappings might not be ready to use due to permissive library design or investigating a variant cell line. By re-annotating CRISPR guides, Exorcise focuses CRISPR experiments towards the genome of the cell line under investigation. Exorcise can be applied at the library design stage or the analysis stage and allows post hoc re-analysis of completed screens. It is available under a Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal licence at https://github.com/SimonLammmm/exorcise .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.