ArticleBMC women's health2024
Survival trends of patients with metaplastic breast carcinoma with different hormone receptor statuses: a SEER-based retrospective cohort study.
Article in BMC women's health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Metaplastic Conundrum: A National Cancer Database Analysis of Metaplastic versus Triple-Negative Ductal Breast Cancer.Annals of surgical oncology · 2025Article
- Prognostic value of FDG PET/CT in special types of breast cancer with non-favorable histology.Discover oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMetaplastic breast carcinoma (MpBC) is a rare histological subtype of breast cancer, and its prognosis is relatively poor. The survival trend of MpBC with different hormone receptor statuses has remained unclear over the past two decades.
methodsMpBC patient data were collected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database from 2000 to 2019. Patients were divided into two groups according to their hormone receptor status (negative and positive). The survival probabilities were calculated via Kaplan‒Meier curves. Logistic regression analysis was used to obtain odds ratios for treatment and demographic characteristics. Multivariate Cox regression was used to identify prognostic factors.
resultsA total of 3,076 patients were enrolled, and a significant improvement in survival was observed over the last 10 years. For HR-negative MpBC patients, both overall survival and breast cancer-specific survival improved, whereas no survival improvement was observed for HR-positive patients. Compared with those in the time period from 2000 to 2009, the proportion of negative nodes and the likelihood of receiving chemotherapy increased for HR-negative patients from 2010 to 2019. In the HR-negative subgroup, the survival of Whites improved significantly, whereas the survival of Blacks improved in the HR-positive subgroup.
conclusionsThe survival of HR-negative MpBC patients has improved significantly in the past 20 years, which may be related to early diagnosis, increased adjuvant therapy and medical development, but no trend towards improvement has been observed in HR-positive patients. Racial disparities in different HR statuses also need to be addressed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.