Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39593061›Full record

ArticleMalaria journal2024

Procedural legitimacy: co-developing a community agreement model for genetic approaches research to malaria control in Africa.

Naima Sykes, Jude Bigirwenkya, Isabelle Coche, Mouhammed Drabo, Divine Dzokoto, Samantha O'Loughlin, Lea Pare Toe, Alexandre Quach, Delphine Thizy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Malaria journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Naima SykesImperial College London, London, UK.
Jude BigirwenkyaUganda Virus Research Institute, Entebbe, Uganda.
Isabelle CocheEmerging Ag, Calgary, Canada.
Mouhammed DraboImperial College London, London, UK.
Divine DzokotoUniversity of Ghana, Accra, Ghana.
Samantha O'LoughlinImperial College London, London, UK.
Lea Pare ToeInstitut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.
Alexandre QuachImperial College London, London, UK.
Delphine ThizyDelphine Thizy Consulting, Brussels, Belgium. delphine@thizyconsulting.com.

Funding

Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation OPP1141988Open Philanthropy Project 2016-161185
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With reductions in the malaria burden stalling in the past years, gene drive holds promise as a novel way of reducing disease transmission. Governance and decision-making processes are pivotal aspects of the legitimate adoption of this technology. Here, the authors explore Target Malaria's journey in developing a community agreement model for the release of non-gene drive genetically modified mosquitoes. They describe the iterative development of the model, including consultations with experts, stakeholder engagement, and alignment with principles of procedural justice. Several challenges were identified during its development, including defining communities, ensuring adequate information, consultation, monitoring, and achieving a common decision between dissenting and consenting viewpoints. They underscore the complexity of developing a legitimate model and emphasize the importance of transparency, procedural legitimacy, and adherence to ethical principles. This paper does not describe the model itself, which will be the subject of another paper. Instead it focuses on the process, to share this experience with other projects-those working with gene drive, or any other projects requiring a community-level decision-making process. The model builds on Target Malaria's experience with the release of genetically modified sterile male mosquitoes, to address the challenges posed by modified mosquitoes which are fertile and would therefore be expected to persist longer in the environment and spread further than the sterile male mosquito strains. While the level of spread and persistence of these non gene drive, but fertile, modified mosquitoes are expected to be substantially lower than those of the gene drive mosquitoes, the process is an essential advance in accommodating the broader geographical and temporal concerns associated with the more permanent spread of gene drive mosquitoes. The work described here constitutes part of the evolution of a community agreement process that could be applied to proposals for releases of gene drive mosquitoes for malaria control. In describing this process, Target Malaria hopes to contribute to the ongoing dialogue on good practices for community agreement engagement in research for genetic vector control approaches and to share the experience of building legitimacy while designing such agreement models.

Indexed as

Gene Drive TechnologyMalariaAfricaAnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedHumansMosquito ControlMosquito VectorsArea-wideCo-developmentCommunity agreementCommunity authorizationCommunity representationConsentField evaluationGene driveGenetically modified mosquitoesMalariaProcedural justiceProcedural legitimacyStakeholder engagementStakeholder legitimacyVector control

Identifiers

PMID39593061
PMCPMC11600682

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.