ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2024
Optimizing continuous passive motion duration following arthroscopic release of elbow contracture: a retrospective study.
Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Traumatic elbow stiffness: pathogenic spectrum and comparative outcomes of minimally invasive versus open release surgery.American journal of translational research · 2026Article
- Postoperative Stiffness After Upper Limb Surgery: Prevention and Management.Orthopedic reviews · 2026Article
- Usability Evaluation of an Electrically Powered Orthopedic Exerciser: Focus Group Interview and Satisfaction Survey Study.JMIR human factors · 2025Article
- [Effectiveness of arthroscopic release assisted with medial small incision in treatment of non-traumatic elbow stiffness].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe anatomical structure of the elbow joint makes it vulnerable to contractures. While elbow arthroscopy minimizes soft tissue damage and enhances early rehabilitation, the optimal duration for postoperative Continuous Passive Motion (CPM) therapy is unclear. This retrospective study aims to establish the appropriate duration of CPM following arthroscopic elbow contracture release.
methodsWe analyzed postoperative outcomes from patients undergoing CPM rehabilitation for 1, 3, or 5 months. Metrics such as ASES, VAS, DASH, MEPS scores, grip strength, and range of motion were assessed before surgery and at 1,3,6 and 12 months post-surgery.
resultsPatients who received 3 or 5 months of CPM therapy showed statistically significant improvements in elbow flexion-extension, range of motion, and functional scores (ASES, VAS, DASH, MEPS) compared to the 1-month group (p < 0.05). However, no significant differences were observed between the 3- and 5-month groups.
conclusionsA 3-month CPM period is effective for patients with higher functional demands, with no additional benefit from extending therapy to 5 months.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.