ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2024
Application of digital classification based on AO classification in floating knee injury.
Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveA digital classification system based on AO classification was adopted to study and summarize different types of floating knee injuries.
methodsOne hundred cases with a floating knee injury from March 2005 to December 2020 were collected, including 74 males and 26 females with an average age of 43.74 years. The distribution of the affected limbs in there were 51 cases (51.0%) on the left and 46 cases (46.0%) on the right, as well as 3 cases (3.0%) that got bilaterally affected limbs. The femora and tibiae in this system were divided into three parts separately based on the AO classification, which was finally composed of six types after pairwise combination. The images in this study would be analyzed by using the classification to summarize the distribution rules of the classification in a floating knee injury.
resultsThe proportion of I-VI type injury was 42.7%(44/103) in type I, 18.4%(19/103) in type II, 9.7%(10/103) in type III, 10.7%(11/103) in type IV, 11.7%(12/103) in type V, and 6.8%(7/103) in type VI.
conclusionsThe digital classification system of floating knee injury based on AO classification could classify most cases of floating knee injury and cases with open injury, which referred to a reference effectively for the selection of surgical treatment plan, and would be conducive to the future clinical classification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.