Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39593017›Full record

SynthesisBMC medical education2024

Peer teachers as ultrasound instructors? - a systematic literature review of peer teaching concepts in undergraduate ultrasound education.

Lone Winter, Ricarda Neubauer, Johannes Weimer, Christoph F Dietrich, Agnes Wittek, Lina Schiestl, Milka Marinova, Valentin Sebastian Schäfer, Brigitte Strizek, Florian Recker

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC medical education, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Learning Anatomy With Radiology: A Systematic Review.Clinical anatomy (New York, N.Y.) · 2026
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Lone Winter *Department of Obstetrics and Prenatal Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg Campus 1, Bonn, 53127, Germany.
Ricarda Neubauer *Department of Obstetrics and Prenatal Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg Campus 1, Bonn, 53127, Germany.
Johannes WeimerRudolf Frey Learning Clinic, University Medical Centre of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Christoph F DietrichDepartment General Internal Medicine (DAIM), Hospitals Hirslanden Bern Beau Site, Salem and Permanence, Bern, Switzerland.
Agnes WittekDepartment of Obstetrics and Prenatal Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg Campus 1, Bonn, 53127, Germany.
Lina SchiestlDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Milka MarinovaDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg Campus 1, Bonn, 53127, Germany.
Valentin Sebastian SchäferDepartment of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Clinic of Internal Medicine III, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Brigitte StrizekDepartment of Obstetrics and Prenatal Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg Campus 1, Bonn, 53127, Germany.
Florian ReckerDepartment of Obstetrics and Prenatal Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg Campus 1, Bonn, 53127, Germany. florian.recker@ukbonn.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAs ultrasound is one of the most utilized imaging procedures in clinical practice in Germany, its integration into undergraduate medical education is imperative. Thereby, the limited availability of qualified instructors is a major challenge. Peer tutors, who are trained to instruct their peers collaboratively, could resolve staff constraints. This systematic review explores the literature on peer teaching in undergraduate ultrasound education, aiming to provide an overview of methodologies, outcomes, and peer teacher training concepts.

methodsFollowing the PRISMA guidelines, a systematic literature review was conducted on the subject of peer teaching in undergraduate ultrasound education. Using PubMed and Google Scholar as databases, studies in English or German involving training concepts for peer teachers in undergraduate ultrasound education, published up to November 21, 2023, were included. Data extraction of original studies followed the PICOS schema with special respect to didactic concepts of peer tutor training programs and the effectiveness of peer teachers compared to faculty instructors. A modified version of the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to assess the quality of included studies.

resultsFinally, the search resulted in 20 relevant original studies, including 16 studies exploring peer teacher training concepts. Predominantly, peer teachers studied in their 4th year of medical school and on average one year further compared to their students. Peer teacher training was integrated into curricula by course-based concepts (93.8%) and internships (50.0%). Didactic modalities varied, encompassing laboratory rotations including the scanning of patients, the scanning of fellow students, lectures, and didactic training. The median training duration was about ten days. Of six comparative studies, five found peer-assisted learning to be comparably effective and one even better than faculty-led courses.

conclusionDespite the growing amount of literature underlining the effectiveness and wide application of peer teaching in ultrasound education, training concepts stay heterogenous without a standardized system for training and qualifying peer teachers. Developing comprehensive guidelines for peer tutor education could increase acceptance and recognition of peer-assisted learning and ensure minimum training standards.

Indexed as

Education, Medical, UndergraduatePeer GroupTeachingUltrasonographyCurriculumGermanyHumansStudents, MedicalPeer-assisted learningPeer teacher training conceptsPeer teachingStudent ultrasound educationTrain the teacher

Identifiers

PMID39593017
PMCPMC11590509

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.