ArticleBMC medical imaging2024
Deep learning model for the automated detection and classification of central canal and neural foraminal stenosis upon cervical spine magnetic resonance imaging.
Article in BMC medical imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Machine Learning and Deep Learning for the Diagnosis of Cervical Degenerative Diseases: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Pooled it
- Current state of research and future developments of artificial intelligence in pain diagnosis and treatment.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Review
- Machine learning in neuroradiology: Recent developments and applications.World journal of radiology · 2026Review
- Application and performance of deep learning models for the automated diagnosis of cervical central spinal stenosis on MRI: a systematic review.Brain & spine · 2026Review
- Feasibility of fully automatic assessment of cervical canal stenosis using MRI via deep learning.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Deep-Learning-Based Computer-Aided Grading of Cervical Spinal Stenosis from MR Images: Accuracy and Clinical Alignment.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundA deep learning (DL) model that can automatically detect and classify cervical canal and neural foraminal stenosis using cervical spine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can improve diagnostic accuracy and efficiency.
methodsA method comprising region-of-interest (ROI) detection and cascade prediction was formulated for diagnosing cervical spinal stenosis based on a DL model. First, three part-specific convolutional neural networks were employed to detect the ROIs in different parts of the cervical MR images. Cascade prediction of the stenosis categories was subsequently performed to record the stenosis level and position on each patient slice. Finally, the results were combined to obtain a patient-level diagnostic report. Performance was evaluated based on the accuracy (ACC), area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, F1 Score, diagnosis time of the DL model, and recall rate for ROI detection localization.
resultsThe average recall rate of the ROI localization was 89.3% (neural foramen) and 99.7% (central canal) under the five-fold cross-validation of the DL model. In the dichotomous classification (normal or mild vs. moderate or severe), the ACC and AUC of the DL model were comparable to those of the radiologists, and the F1 score (84.8%) of the DL model was slightly higher than that of the radiologists (83.8%) for the central canal. Diagnosing whether the central canal or neural foramen of a slice is narrowed in the cervical MRI scan required an average of 15 and 0.098 s for the radiologists and DL model, respectively.
conclusionsThe DL model demonstrated comparable performance with subspecialist radiologists for the detection and classification of central canal and neural foraminal stenosis on cervical spine MRI. Moreover, the DL model demonstrated significant timesaving ability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.