Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39593012›Full record

ArticleBMC medical imaging2024

Deep learning model for the automated detection and classification of central canal and neural foraminal stenosis upon cervical spine magnetic resonance imaging.

Enlong Zhang, Meiyi Yao, Yuan Li, Qizheng Wang, Xinhang Song, Yongye Chen, Ke Liu, Weili Zhao, Xiaoying Xing, Yan Zhou and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Enlong Zhang *Department of Radiology, Peking University Third Hospital, 49 North Garden Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, PR China.
Meiyi Yao *Institute of Computing Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Yuan Li *Department of Radiology, Peking University Third Hospital, 49 North Garden Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, PR China.
Qizheng Wang *Department of Radiology, Peking University Third Hospital, 49 North Garden Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, PR China.
Xinhang SongInstitute of Computing Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Yongye ChenDepartment of Radiology, Peking University Third Hospital, 49 North Garden Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, PR China.
Ke LiuDepartment of Radiology, Peking University Third Hospital, 49 North Garden Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, PR China.
Weili ZhaoDepartment of Radiology, Peking University Third Hospital, 49 North Garden Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, PR China.
Xiaoying XingDepartment of Radiology, Peking University Third Hospital, 49 North Garden Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, PR China.
Yan ZhouDepartment of Radiology, Peking University Third Hospital, 49 North Garden Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, PR China.
Fanyu MengInstitute of Computing Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Hanqiang OuyangDepartment of Orthopaedics, Engineering Research Center of Bone and Joint Precision Medicine, Beijing Key Laboratory of Spinal Disease Research, Peking University Third Hospital, 49 North Garden Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China.
Gongwei ChenInstitute of Computing Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Liang JiangDepartment of Orthopaedics, Engineering Research Center of Bone and Joint Precision Medicine, Beijing Key Laboratory of Spinal Disease Research, Peking University Third Hospital, 49 North Garden Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China.
Ning LangDepartment of Radiology, Peking University Third Hospital, 49 North Garden Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, PR China. langning800129@126.com.
Shuqiang JiangInstitute of Computing Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China. sqjiang@ict.ac.cn.
Huishu YuanDepartment of Radiology, Peking University Third Hospital, 49 North Garden Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, PR China. huishuy@sina.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA deep learning (DL) model that can automatically detect and classify cervical canal and neural foraminal stenosis using cervical spine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can improve diagnostic accuracy and efficiency.

methodsA method comprising region-of-interest (ROI) detection and cascade prediction was formulated for diagnosing cervical spinal stenosis based on a DL model. First, three part-specific convolutional neural networks were employed to detect the ROIs in different parts of the cervical MR images. Cascade prediction of the stenosis categories was subsequently performed to record the stenosis level and position on each patient slice. Finally, the results were combined to obtain a patient-level diagnostic report. Performance was evaluated based on the accuracy (ACC), area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, F1 Score, diagnosis time of the DL model, and recall rate for ROI detection localization.

resultsThe average recall rate of the ROI localization was 89.3% (neural foramen) and 99.7% (central canal) under the five-fold cross-validation of the DL model. In the dichotomous classification (normal or mild vs. moderate or severe), the ACC and AUC of the DL model were comparable to those of the radiologists, and the F1 score (84.8%) of the DL model was slightly higher than that of the radiologists (83.8%) for the central canal. Diagnosing whether the central canal or neural foramen of a slice is narrowed in the cervical MRI scan required an average of 15 and 0.098 s for the radiologists and DL model, respectively.

conclusionsThe DL model demonstrated comparable performance with subspecialist radiologists for the detection and classification of central canal and neural foraminal stenosis on cervical spine MRI. Moreover, the DL model demonstrated significant timesaving ability.

Indexed as

Cervical VertebraeDeep LearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingSpinal StenosisAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeural Networks, ComputerSensitivity and SpecificityCervical spinal stenosisConvolutional neural networkDeep learningMRI

Identifiers

PMID39593012
PMCPMC11590449

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.