Trial reportBMC anesthesiology2024
Effect of low-dose dexmedetomidine to prolong spinal anesthesia in elderly patients: a prospective randomized controlled study.
Trial report in BMC anesthesiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Analgesic and Hemodynamic Effects of Dexmedetomidine-Ketamine vs Fentanyl-Ketamine in Healthy Volunteers: A Randomized Trial.Journal of pain research · 2025Trial
- Serious adverse effect of low-dose dexmedetomidine under spinal anesthesia: A case report and literature review.Qatar medical journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSpinal anesthesia for transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) has a short duration, which poses challenges for postoperative pain management. The present study aimed to investigate the effects of intravenous (IV) dexmedetomidine at a dosage of 0.4 µg/kg in prolonging the duration of spinal anesthesia and minimizing postoperative pain in elderly patients undergoing TURP.
methodsThis prospective randomized controlled trial enrolled 38 patients aged 60-80 years who underwent elective TURP with spinal anesthesia. The patients were randomly assigned to two treatment groups: Group D received IV 0.4 µg/kg dexmedetomidine, whereas Group C received IV normal saline after spinal anesthesia administration. The primary outcome was the time to 2-dermatome regression.
resultsThe 2-dermatome regression time was longer in Group D than in Group C (104.44 ± 16.97 min vs. 80.63 ± 15.59 min, p < 0.05). The peak sensory block levels were significantly higher in Group D [T7 (T6-T8)] than in Group C [T10 (T7-T10)] (p = 0.017). The incidence of hypotension and bradycardia and postoperative pain at 0, 6, 12, and 24 h were not different between two groups.
conclusionIntravenous dexmedetomidine at a dosage of 0.4 µg/kg significantly prolongs the duration of spinal sensory blockade. Although postoperative analgesia was not different, it provided hemodynamic stability without increasing the side effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.