Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39592966›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2024

The characteristics of formula milk marketing on health system: a qualitative study from Beijing and Jinan in China.

Yinghang Wang, Hanxiyue Zhang, Suying Chang, Ge Yang, Wen Wang, Xinyi Lv, Zhi Lin, Shuyi Zhang, Angela Y Xiao, Anuradha Narayan and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Yinghang Wang *Vanke School of Public Health, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Hanxiyue Zhang *Vanke School of Public Health, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Suying ChangUnited Nations Children's Fund Office for China, Beijing, China.
Ge YangDivision of Neonatology and Center for Newborn Care, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou, China.
Wen WangInstitute for Social and Economic Research, University of Essex, Essex, UK.
Xinyi LvNational Research Institute for Family Planning, Beijing, China.
Zhi LinPeking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China.
Shuyi ZhangCapital Institute of Pediatrics, Beijing, China.
Angela Y XiaoVanke School of Public Health, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Anuradha NarayanUnited Nations Children's Fund Office for China, Beijing, China. anarayan@unicef.org.
Kun TangVanke School of Public Health, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China. tangk@mail.tsinghua.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBreastmilk is widely regarded as the healthiest choice for both infants and mothers due to its numerous advantages over formula, such as higher concentrations of essential nutrients and antibodies, easier digestion, and superior taste. The World Health Organization International Code of Marketing of Breast-milk Substitutes was adopted over 40 years ago to mitigate the effects of infant formula marketing on a woman's decision to breastfeed. Yet, the commercial formula milk industry has continued to market their products aggressively and through an increasing variety of social media channels. This study examines the impact of formula milk marketing on specific components of the health system to understand how systems that are built to support and sustain breastfeeding may have been captured and repurposed by industry practices.

methodsAs part of A Multi-country Study of Early Infant Feeding Decisions, this qualitative study was conducted in two representative cities in China, Beijing and Jinan, in 2020. The participants were recruited through convenience sampling and snowballing sampling methods. Data were collected through 40 in-depth interviews and 10 focus group discussions with health professionals, pregnant women, and formula milk marketing executives. A thematic analytical method was used to analyze the main themes and sub-themes that detail the characteristics of formula milk marketing and its impact on the health system in China.

resultsOur results identified the most common practices used by the formula milk industry to reach health workers as well as mothers and their families through health systems. Such practices include (1) provider/facility-based marketing to sponsor academic activities (e.g., seminars, conferences, and research projects) and promote specialized infant formula that targets health care providers and facilities, which influence the health consultations and recommendations provided by health professionals to mothers and families; and (2) receiver-based marketing that targets Chinese women and increases marketing exposure through lectures provided by maternity schools at health facilities during the antenatal period and health promotion activities organized by formula milk companies outside of facilities during the postnatal care period.

conclusionsFormula milk marketing aims to influence the practices and services within the health system in China, both directly through health professionals and facilities, and also indirectly by targeting mothers. These marketing strategies have impacted the perceptions of providers on formula milk, and strategies targeting consumers have aimed to further influence and undermine mothers' intentions to continue breastfeeding. Stricter regulation of industry marketing practices is needed to create a supportive environment for mothers to breastfeed.

Indexed as

Infant FormulaMarketingQualitative ResearchAdultBeijingBreast FeedingChinaFemaleFocus GroupsHumansInfantInfant, NewbornInterviews as TopicPregnancyBreastfeedingBreastfeeding practiceBreast milk substituteHealth claimsInfant formula

Identifiers

PMID39592966
PMCPMC11600680

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.