Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39592933›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2024

Human limits in machine learning: prediction of potato yield and disease using soil microbiome data.

Rosa Aghdam, Xudong Tang, Shan Shan, Richard Lankau, Claudia Solís-Lemus

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rosa Aghdam *Wisconsin Institute for Discovery, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Xudong Tang *Wisconsin Institute for Discovery, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Shan ShanDepartment of Plant Pathology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Richard LankauDepartment of Plant Pathology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Claudia Solís-LemusWisconsin Institute for Discovery, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA. solislemus@wisc.edu.

Funding

Specialty Crop Multi-State Grant Program award SCMP1701U.S. Department of Energy DE-SC0021016
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe preservation of soil health is a critical challenge in the 21st century due to its significant impact on agriculture, human health, and biodiversity. We provide one of the first comprehensive investigations into the predictive potential of machine learning models for understanding the connections between soil and biological phenotypes. We investigate an integrative framework performing accurate machine learning-based prediction of plant performance from biological, chemical, and physical properties of the soil via two models: random forest and Bayesian neural network.

resultsPrediction improves when we add environmental features, such as soil properties and microbial density, along with microbiome data. Different preprocessing strategies show that human decisions significantly impact predictive performance. We show that the naive total sum scaling normalization that is commonly used in microbiome research is one of the optimal strategies to maximize predictive power. Also, we find that accurately defined labels are more important than normalization, taxonomic level, or model characteristics. ML performance is limited when humans can't classify samples accurately. Lastly, we provide domain scientists via a full model selection decision tree to identify the human choices that optimize model prediction power.

conclusionsOur study highlights the importance of incorporating diverse environmental features and careful data preprocessing in enhancing the predictive power of machine learning models for soil and biological phenotype connections. This approach can significantly contribute to advancing agricultural practices and soil health management.

Indexed as

Machine LearningMicrobiotaSoil MicrobiologySolanum tuberosumBayes TheoremHumansPlant DiseasesSoilSoilBayesian neural networksMachine learningMicrobiome networks analysisPhenotype predictionSoil microbiome

Identifiers

PMID39592933
PMCPMC11600749

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.