SynthesisBMC anesthesiology2024
Whether monitored anesthesia care is the optimal anesthetic strategy for transcatheter aortic valve implantation surgery? a meta-analysis and systematic review.
Synthesis in BMC anesthesiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Remimazolam Versus Dexmedetomidine for Monitored Anesthesia Care in Patients Undergoing Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: A Randomized Clinical Trial.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Predictive value of ultrasound-measured tongue base thickness for upper airway obstruction during monitored anesthesia care: a single-center prospective observational study.Journal of anesthesia · 2026Article
- Adverse events with monitored anesthesia care sedation in patients with stroke receiving mechanical thrombectomy.Orthopedic reviews · 2026Article
- A Narrative Review on Current Status of Conscious Sedation for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo explore whether monitored anesthesia care is more beneficial to the outcome of transcatheter aortic valve implantation.
methodsThe research methodology involved comprehensive searches across major databases, including the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, covering the period from January 1, 2010, to March 1, 2024. The aim was to identify trials comparing different anesthetic methods for transcatheter aortic valve implantation. The primary outcomes assessed were mortality and length of hospital stay, while secondary outcomes included common complications such as bleeding, stroke, paravalvular leakage, renal failure, and others. Data synthesis was conducted using risk ratios or standardized mean differences, along with 95% confidence intervals. The study protocol was prospectively registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024507749).
resultsA total of 35 trials and 45,616 patients were included in this study. The results showed that monitored anesthesia care significantly reduced the patient's risk of death, shortened the patient's length of hospital stay, and also reduced the risk of common complications such as paravalvular leakage (RR, 0.80; 95% CI: 0.72 to 0.88; p < 0.00001; I
conclusionMonitored anesthesia care has an absolute advantage in patient survival and effectively shortens the length of hospitalization. In addition, it also reduces the risk of complications such as paravalvular leakage and stroke. Monitoring care under anesthesia plays a vital role during TAVI surgery, not only helping to ensure the smooth progress of the surgery and patient safety, but also promoting the patient's recovery and recovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.