ReviewLab animal2025
Twenty-first century mouse genetics is again at an inflection point.
Review in Lab animal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- From Chatbots to Co-Scientists: The Impact of Knowledge-Generating AI (AI 4.0) on Healthcare and Research.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Novel candidate genes for vestibular function identified through GWAS in the hybrid mouse diversity panel.BMC genomics · 2026Article
- A Murine Database of Structural Variants Identifies A Candidate Gene for a Spontaneous Murine Lymphoma Model.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- A tandem repeat atlas for the genome of inbred mouse strains: A genetic variation resource.iScience · 2025Article
- A Tandem Repeat Atlas for the Genome of Inbred Mouse Strains: A Genetic Variation Resource.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- A Murine Database of Structural Variants Enables the Genetic Architecture of a Spontaneous Murine Lymphoma to be Characterized.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The laboratory mouse has been the premier model organism for biomedical research owing to the availability of multiple well-characterized inbred strains, its mammalian physiology and its homozygous genome, and because experiments can be performed under conditions that control environmental variables. Moreover, its genome can be genetically modified to assess the impact of allelic variation on phenotype. Mouse models have been used to discover or test many therapies that are commonly used today. Mouse genetic discoveries are often made using genome-wide association study methods that compare allelic differences in panels of inbred mouse strains with their phenotypic responses. Here we examine changes in the methods used to analyze mouse genetic models of biomedical traits during the twenty-first century. To do this, we first examine where mouse genetics was before the first inflection point, which was just before the revolution in genome sequencing that occurred 20 years ago, and then describe the factors that have accelerated the pace of mouse genetic discovery. We focus on mouse genetic studies that have generated findings that either were translated to humans or could impact clinical medicine or drug development. We next explore how advances in computational capabilities and in DNA sequencing methodology during the past 20 years could enhance the ability of mouse genetics to produce solutions for twenty-first century public-health problems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.