ArticleScientific reports2024
Development of a flexible feature selection framework in radiomics-based prediction modeling: Assessment with four real-world datasets.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Radiomics-based MRI model for predicting the severity of rotator cuff tears.Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Integrative machine learning analysis suggests novel molecular targets for liver cancer diagnosis and therapy.Discover oncology · 2026Article
- A novel multimodal AI-based radiomics approach for precision assessment of pain intensity in chronic nonspecific low back pain.Journal of orthopaedic translation · 2026Article
- CT-based intrathrombus and perithrombus radiomics for predicting complete recanalization after endovascular thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Article
- Radiomics in Action: Multimodal Synergies for Imaging Biomarkers.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Use of Radiomics in Characterizing Tumor Hypoxia.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There are several important challenges in radiomics research; one of them is feature selection. Since many quantitative features are non-informative, feature selection becomes essential. Feature selection methods have been mixed with filter, wrapper, and embedded methods without a rule of thumb. This study aims to develop a framework for optimal feature selection in radiomics research. We developed the framework that the optimal features were selected to quickly through controlling relevance and redundancy among features. A 'FeatureMap' was generated containing information for each step and used as a platform. Through this framework, we can explore the optimal combination of radiomics features and evaluate the predictive performance using only selected features. We assessed the framework using four real datasets. The FeatureMap generated 6 combinations, with the number of features selected varying for each combination. The predictive models obtained high performances; the highest test area under the curves (AUCs) were 0.792, 0.820, 0.846 and 0.738 in the cross-validation method, respectively. We developed a flexible framework for feature selection methods in radiomics research and assessed its usefulness using various real-world data. Our framework can assist clinicians in efficiently developing predictive models based on radiomics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.