Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39592854›Full record

ReviewCommunications biology2024

Comprehensive tools for ecological restoration of soils foster sustainable use and resilience of agricultural land.

L Neuenkamp, D García de León, U Hamer, N Hölzel, E McGale, S E Hannula

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Communications biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

L NeuenkampUniversity of Münster, Münster, Germany. lena.neuenkamp@uni-muenster.de.ORCID 0000-0001-6108-5720
D García de LeónAyuntamiento de Mejorada del Campo, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-8165-6965
U HamerUniversity of Münster, Münster, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3845-3983
N HölzelUniversity of Münster, Münster, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6367-3400
E McGaleUniversity of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-5996-4213
S E HannulaUniversity of Leiden, Leiden, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1398-2018

Funding

Marie Curie 835472
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Soils are the backbone of terrestrial ecosystems, underpinning their biodiversity and functioning. They are also key to agricultural production and ecosystem development. Although focus on effective and profitable food production has led to severely degraded soils, the tools and standards for restoration strategies in agricultural soils are still largely underdeveloped. In this review, we summarize recent developments in ecological restoration practice for soils, evaluate whether these are in line with ecological theory, identify where they could be improved, and contextualize these to agricultural soil restoration. We identify restoration actions and success indicators that may best foster sustainable use of agricultural soils while also increasing their multifunctionality, that is their ability to simultaneously supply multiple ecosystem services including provisioning food and feed. Lastly, we explore actions available to improve soil health and focus on tool and indicator implementation. Calls for reductions in provisioning services, such as yield production, commonly used in ecological restoration practices conflict most directly with wider soil-ecosystem-service-focused restoration actions, including supporting and regulating services. Comprehensive restoration actions harnessing the interdependence of multiple soil properties, including contribution to vegetative yield, appear to be most efficient in agricultural settings with a central role of soil biodiversity in ecosystem service provisioning.

Indexed as

AgricultureConservation of Natural ResourcesEcosystemSoilBiodiversityEnvironmental Restoration and RemediationSustainable DevelopmentSoil

Identifiers

PMID39592854
PMCPMC11599581

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.