Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39592816›Full record

Trial reportCommunications biology2024

Analgesic effects of high-frequency rTMS on pain anticipation and perception.

Xiaoyun Li, Zhouan Liu, Yuzhen Hu, Richu Jin, Wutao Lou, Weiwei Peng

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Communications biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. An update on the effects of cerebellar transcranial magnetic stimulation on cognitive function.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Non-invasive brain stimulation for neuropathic orofacial pain: a mini-review.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Xiaoyun Li *School of Psychology, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China.
Zhouan Liu *School of Psychology, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China.
Yuzhen HuSchool of Psychology, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China.
Richu JinTech X Academy, Shenzhen Polytechnic University, Shenzhen, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7015-5302
Wutao LouDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China. wlou@cuhk.edu.hk.ORCID 0000-0002-6844-2847
Weiwei PengSchool of Psychology, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China. ww.peng0923@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-4600-0036

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 32200900National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 32271105National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 62101236
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous studies suggest that pain perception is greatly shaped by anticipation, with M1 and DLPFC involved in this process. We hypothesized that high-frequency rTMS targeting these regions could alter pain anticipation and thereby reduce pain perception. In a double-blind, sham-controlled study, healthy participants received 10 Hz rTMS to M1, DLPFC, or a sham treatment. Assessments were conducted before, immediately after, and 60 min after stimulation, including laser-evoked potentials, pain ratings, and anticipatory EEG. M1-rTMS immediately reduced laser-evoked P2 amplitude, increased sensorimotor high-frequency α-oscillation power, and accelerated peak alpha frequency in the midfrontal region during pain anticipation. In contrast, DLPFC-rTMS reduced the N2-P2 complex and pain ratings 60 min post-stimulation, an effect associated with prolonged microstate C duration during pain anticipation-a microstate linked to default mode network activity. Thus, M1-rTMS immediately modulates anticipatory α-oscillations and laser-evoked potentials, while DLPFC-rTMS induces delayed analgesic effects partially by modulating default mode network activity.

Indexed as

Anticipation, PsychologicalPain PerceptionTranscranial Magnetic StimulationAdultDorsolateral Prefrontal CortexDouble-Blind MethodElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansLaser-Evoked PotentialsMaleMotor CortexPainPain ManagementYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID39592816
PMCPMC11599282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.