ArticleScientific reports2024
Predictive dermoscopic features of cryotherapy treatment response in cutaneous warts.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- 20-MHz high-intensity focused ultrasound for seborrheic keratoses of the head and neck: outcomes and dermoscopic predictors.Postepy dermatologii i alergologii · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The utility of dermoscopy for the diagnosis of cutaneous warts is well known. However, its role in predicting the outcome of cryotherapy for cutaneous warts remains unexplored. To identify dermoscopic features predicting treatment responses in cryotherapy for cutaneous warts. We conducted a retrospective analysis of 119 warts in 103 patients. Responses were categorized as complete, partial, or none after three sessions of cryotherapy within 4 months. The evaluated features included vascularity, papillary patterns, and margin characteristics. Marked surface scales and well-defined margins were common in complete responses. Minimal surface scales and smooth patterns were observed in less responsive cases. In the group with a complete response, marked surface scales were observed 6.59 times more frequently, well-defined margins were 4.1 times more common, and dots were 4.07 times more common compared to the group with no response. Common warts responded well when showing vascularity and marked surface scales, whereas plantar warts responded positively when showing background erythema. Dermoscopic features, such as dots, marked surface scales, and well-defined margins, predict a favorable cryotherapy response in cutaneous warts. Plantar warts respond positively in the presence of perilesional erythema, whereas common warts exhibit vascularity and marked surface scales for a better response to cryotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.