Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39592747›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Longitudinal study of metacognition's role in self-efficacy and hope development.

Paweł Kleka, Hanna Brycz, Mariusz Zięba, Agnieszka Fanslau

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Paweł KlekaDepartment of Psychology and Cognitive Science, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland. pawel.kleka@amu.edu.pl.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0841-0015
Hanna BryczDepartment of Psychology, University of Gdansk, Gdańsk, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7003-9793
Mariusz ZiębaSWPS University, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3492-2236
Agnieszka FanslauDepartment of Psychology, University of Gdansk, Gdańsk, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3081-3235

Funding

Narodowe Centrum Nauki 2013/11/B/HS6/01463
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Self-regulation is a critical component of adaptive functioning, and individual differences in traits like metacognitive self-awareness (MCS), general self-efficacy (GSE), and hope play significant roles in influencing this ability. Self-awareness of cognitive biases is particularly relevant as it may enhance one's capacity to manage challenges and pursue goals effectively. Prior research suggests that higher levels of MCS are associated with improved self-regulation, greater self-efficacy, and stronger hope for success. This longitudinal study sought to explore the development of self-regulation across 3 years of college education, with a specific focus on the role of MCS in shaping the trajectories of GSE and hope. Over 400 undergraduates were assessed five times throughout this period. Growth curve and causal mediation analyses were employed to examine the extent to which MCS contributed to changes in GSE and hope. Our findings indicate that self-awareness of cognitive biases (MCS) significantly influences the development of self-efficacy. Participants with higher levels of MCS exhibited a slightly faster increase in coping skills than those with lower levels. Additionally, MCS moderated the development of hope: individuals with above-median MCS scores showed a faster increase in hope, whereas those with below-median scores experienced an irregular decrease. In conclusion, MCS serves as a valuable resource for developing self-efficacy and hope. However, the influence of real-life challenges on hope appears to depend on an individual's metacognitive skills, with better outcomes observed among those with higher MCS.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PsychologicalHopeMetacognitionSelf EfficacyAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleStudentsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID39592747
PMCPMC11599935

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.