ArticleNature plants2024
Co-option of plant gene regulatory network in nutrient responses during terrestrialization.
Article in Nature plants, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- The multifaceted regulatory network of microRNA396: Orchestrating plant plasticity through coordinating development and various stresses.Journal of integrative plant biology · 2026Review
- Convergent genomic trajectories shape adaptation to life on land across animal lineages.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Phytohormone dynamics in tomato leaves due to in-situ continuous wearing of sensors.Plant methods · 2026Article
- Evolutionary shifts in plant adaptation mediated by phytohormones.Plant communications · 2026Review
- Copper-sensitive OsSPL9 TF regulates expression of indica rice domestication-associated miRNAs and phenotypes.Communications biology · 2026Article
- Co-option of transcription factors drives evolution of quantitative disease resistance against a necrotrophic pathogen.The Plant cell · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Plant responses to nitrate, phosphate and sucrose form a complex molecular network crucial for terrestrial adaptation. However, the origins, functional diversity and evolvability of this network during plant terrestrialization remain scarcely understood. Here we compare the transcriptomic response to these nutrients in the bryophyte Marchantia polymorpha and the streptophyte alga Klebsormidium nitens. We show that the largely species-specific nutrient response pattern is driven by gene regulatory network (GRN) alterations. Intriguingly, while pathways governing the GRNs exhibit modest conservation, M. polymorpha GRNs exhibit more regulatory connections through the redeployment of ancient transcription factor CSD. In M. polymorpha, functional analyses reveal the involvement of pre-existing cytokinin machineries in downstream targets, orchestrating plastic morpho-physiological responses to nutrient status. Our findings implicate the genetic co-option events facilitating successful land plant establishment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39592744What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.