ArticleScientific reports2024
Red blood cell count and cystatin C as the specific biomarkers for diabetic retinopathy from diabetes mellitus: a case-control study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- A nomogram prediction model incorporating noninvasive lens AGEs and conventional biochemical indicators for assessing and predicting diabetic kidney disease.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Recent Investigations on Pathogenesis, Biomarkers, Epigenetics, and Emerging Therapeutic Strategies to Modulate Multiple Signaling Pathways in Diabetic Retinopathy.Journal of ophthalmology · 2026Review
- Relationship between serum cystatin C and diabetic retinopathy in T2DM patients.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a common microvascular complication of diabetes mellitus (DM). However, the blood physiological indicators for this eye disease are less reported. Here, we systemically investigated healthy controls, DR patients and DM patients from 2014 to 2022 in Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital (Chengdu, China). We found the leukocyte count, urea, and direct bilirubin in the DR patients were significantly increased (P < 0.001) compared with the controls. The ratios of aspartate aminotransferase/alanine transaminase, total bilirubin, indirect bilirubin, and red cell distribution width were lower in the DR patients than in the controls (P < 0.001). Notably, Red blood cell count (mean [SD] = 4.54 [0.67] 10E12/L, OR = 0.75) was significantly decreased (P < 0.001), and cystatin C level (mean [SD] = 1.42 [1.13] mg/L, OR = 1.90) was significantly increased in the DR patients compared with the controls (P < 0.001). However, these two indicators were not significantly different between the DM patients and the controls (P = 0.87 and P = 0.14, respectively). Our results showed that red blood cell count and cystatin C are specific biomarkers for DR patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.