Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39592693›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Clinical imaging diagnosis of pulmonary cryptococcosis with different therapeutic responses.

Yan-Li Zhang, Chao Ran, Wei Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yan-Li Zhang *Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Affiliated Hospital of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China.
Chao Ran *Department of Radiology, Affiliated Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital of Qingdao University, Yantai, China.
Wei LiMedical Imaging Department, Affiliated Hospital of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou University, No. 368, Hanjiang Middle Road, Hanjiang District, Yangzhou, 225100, China. liweiqd830127@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We aimed to differentiate and evaluate the clinical imaging features of pulmonary cryptococcosis with different therapeutic responses. The clinical imaging data of 70 patients with PC (complete response PC 37 cases and incomplete response PC 33 cases) were collected and compared to determine the independent risk factors for different therapeutic responses, and their diagnostic performances were verified by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Compared with complete response PC, incomplete response PC was more common with immunosuppression (10.8% vs. 45.5%, P = 0.001), intermediate progress (8.1% vs. 39.4%, P = 0.002), bilateral distribution (21.6% vs. 78.8%, P < 0.001), consolidation-interstitial pattern (10.8% vs. 42.4%, P = 0.003), pleural effusion (0 vs. 27.3%, P = 0.002) and mediastinal lymphadenopathy (0 vs. 24.2%, P = 0.005). Multivariate logistic regression showed that immunosuppression, intermediate progress, and bilateral distribution were independent risk factors, with low to moderate areas under curves (AUC, 0.656-0.786). Their combined performance was good with an AUC of 0.888. The diverse clinical imaging features can reflect the therapeutic response of PC. Immunosuppression, intermediate progress, and bilateral distribution were independent risk factors. Their combination can significantly improve diagnostic effects.

Indexed as

CryptococcosisLung Diseases, FungalAdultAgedAntifungal AgentsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsROC CurveTomography, X-Ray ComputedTreatment OutcomeAntifungal Agents

Identifiers

PMID39592693
PMCPMC11599278

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.