Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39592657›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Characterising the inconsistency between perceived and actual sleep and its impact upon cognition and mood.

Hannah Windmill, Alexander Dyer, Alastair D Smith, Matthew E Roser, Ashwin Dhanda, Stephen D Hall

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Polygenic Index for Sleep Duration and Brain Changes over Time.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hannah WindmillBrain Research and Imaging Centre, Faculty of Health, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK. Hannah.windmill@plymouth.ac.uk.
Alexander DyerBrain Research and Imaging Centre, Faculty of Health, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK.
Alastair D SmithBrain Research and Imaging Centre, Faculty of Health, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK.
Matthew E RoserBrain Research and Imaging Centre, Faculty of Health, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK.
Ashwin DhandaBrain Research and Imaging Centre, Faculty of Health, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK.
Stephen D HallBrain Research and Imaging Centre, Faculty of Health, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sleep profoundly influences human behaviour across cognition, affect, and daily experience. This study evaluated how subjective reports and objective measures of sleep capture the interaction between sleep quality and quantity on cognition and affect. We collected subjective sleep reports using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index and objective seven-day actigraphy recordings from 83 participants. A test battery, including the Stop Signal, Digit Span, and Emotional Bias Tasks, measured response inhibition, working memory, and affect. Mood was evaluated using the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule, State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, and Beck's Anxiety Inventory. We reveal that subjective sleep reports do not predict objectively measured sleep duration or quality. We demonstrate that objective measures predict cognitive performance on executive function and memory tasks for the upper and lower sleep quartiles, while subjective reports do not. Moreover, we demonstrate that subjective reports, but not objective measures, are strongly predicted by emotional state. These findings suggest that while subjective measures do not accurately index actual sleep, they are a reliable proxy for emotional well-being. We propose that combined subjective and objective measures are required to characterise the multifaceted interaction between sleep, cognition and emotion. We discuss the implications of these findings for understanding the cause-effect relationship of sleep-disturbance in neurological and psychiatric disorders.

Indexed as

AffectCognitionSleepActigraphyAdultFemaleHumansMaleMemory, Short-TermMiddle AgedSleep QualityYoung AdultActigraphyAffectCognitionPSQISleepWell-being.

Identifiers

PMID39592657
PMCPMC11599777

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.