ReviewMolecular and cellular biochemistry2025
The role of immunoglobins in atherosclerosis development; friends or foe?
Review in Molecular and cellular biochemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Perspectives of Natural Products and Sialic Acid Mimetics as Modulators of Human Sialidases NEU1-3 in Atherosclerosis.Biomolecules · 2026Review
- B cells and B-cell receptor repertoire features in coronary heart disease: immunopathogenic roles, clinical relevance, and therapeutic potential.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Post-Translational Modifications of Lipoproteins: Emerging Players Linking Inflammation and Cardiovascular Disease in Rheumatoid Arthritis-A Narrative Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- CD40-TRAF6 inhibition suppresses cardiovascular inflammation, oxidative stress and functional complications in a mouse model of arterial hypertension.Redox biology · 2025Article
- Identification of lipid metabolism related immune markers in atherosclerosis through machine learning and experimental analysis.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Coronary artery disease, atherosclerosis, and its life-threatening sequels impose the hugest burden on the healthcare systems throughout the world. The intricate process of atherosclerosis is considered as an inflammatory-based disorder, and therefore, the components of the immune system are involved in different stages from formation of coronary plaques to its development. One of the major effectors in this way are the antibody producing entities, the B cells. These cells, which play a significant and unique role in responding to different stress, injuries, and infections, contribute differently to the development of atherosclerosis, either inhibitory or promoting, depending on the type of subsets. B cells implicate in both systemic and local immune responses of an atherosclerotic artery by cell-cell contact, cytokine production, and antigen presentation. In particular, natural antibodies bind to oxidized lipoproteins and cellular debris, which are abundant during plaque growth. Logically, any defects in B cells and consequent impairment in antibody production may greatly affect the shaping of the plaque and its clinical outcome. In this comprehensive review, we scrutinize the role of B cells and different classes of antibodies in atherosclerosis progression besides current novel B-cell-based therapeutic approaches that aim to resolve this affliction of mankind.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39592554What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.