Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39592537›Full record

ReviewCurrent psychiatry reports2024

Adverse Childhood Experiences and Perinatal Mental Health: A Review of Progress and Future Directions.

Nora L Erickson, Emily R Padrutt, Gretchen Buchanan, Helen G Kim

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current psychiatry reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nora L EricksonDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA. eric4350@umn.edu.
Emily R PadruttInstitute of Child Development, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Gretchen BuchananRedleaf Center for Family Healing, Hennepin Healthcare, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Helen G KimRedleaf Center for Family Healing, Hennepin Healthcare, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThis review includes recent literature on adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) and perinatal mental health. We summarize key findings, including meta-analytic reviews and emerging data on broad risks for psychopathology, mechanistic pathways, protective factors, and ACEs screening within clinical care contexts. RECENT

findingsACEs are associated with small to moderate risks for perinatal depression and anxiety. There is increasing evidence ACEs are also associated with other mental health concerns and transdiagnostic symptoms during pregnancy and postpartum. Possible mechanistic factors include a range of biological and psychosocial variables. Unique effects of benevolent childhood experiences (BCEs) on perinatal mental health are also notable. Continued emphasis on associations between ACEs and perinatal mental health concerns beyond depression and anxiety is needed. More empirical attention to mechanistic and protective factors, including benevolent childhood experiences, is also warranted. Although ACEs screening in clinical settings may be feasible and acceptable, implementation should occur within a healing centered engagement framework.

Indexed as

Adverse Childhood ExperiencesFemaleHumansMental DisordersPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsAdverse childhood experiencesBenevolent childhood experiencesMental healthPostpartumPrenatal

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.