ArticleCardiovascular toxicology2025
The Protective Effects of Carvacrol Against Doxorubicin-Induced Cardiotoxicity In Vitro and In Vivo.
Article in Cardiovascular toxicology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Protective Effect of Carvacrol Against Isoproterenol-Induced Cardiotoxicity in Rats.Medeniyet medical journal · 2026Article
- Thymol and Carvacrol: Molecular Mechanisms, Therapeutic Potential, and Synergy With Conventional Therapies in Cancer Management.Food science & nutrition · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Doxorubicin (DOX) is a remarkable chemotherapeutic agent, however, its adverse effect on DOX-induced cardiotoxicity (DIC) is a rising concern. Recent research has identified carvacrol (CAR), an antioxidant and anti-inflammatory agent, as a promising natural compound for protecting against DIC. This study aims to investigate the potential cardioprotective effects properties of CAR in vitro and in vivo. The cardioprotective effect of CAR was assessed by pretreating H9c2 cells with non-toxic CAR for 24 h, followed by co-treatment with DOX (10 μM) for an additional 24 h. The cell viability was determined using an MTT assay. For the in vivo study, male Sprague-Dawley rats (200-250 g) were randomly divided into three groups: control, cardiotoxicity (DOX), and treatment (CAR + DOX) groups. CAR (50 mg/kg, BW) was administered orally to the CAR + DOX groups for 14 days. Then, a single dose of DOX (15 mg/kg/i.p, BW) was administered on day 15 for DOX and CAR + DOX groups. The rats were allowed to recover for 3 days before being sacrificed. Our results demonstrated that DOX (10 µM) significantly reduced H9c2 cell viability by 50% (p < 0.0001), and CAR (0.067 µM) protected H9c2 cells from DIC (p = 0.0045). In the rat model, CAR pretreatment effectively mitigated DOX-induced reductions in systolic pressure (p = 0.0007), pulse pressure (p = 0.0213), hypertrophy (p = 0.0049), and cardiac fibrosis (p = 0.0006). However, the pretreatment did not alter the heart function, oxidative stress, and antioxidant enzymes. In conclusion, our results indicate that CAR could potentially serve as an adjuvant to reduce cardiotoxicity by ameliorating myocardial fibrosis and hypertrophy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39592525What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.