ArticleDysphagia2025
Upper Esophageal Sphincter Abnormalities and Esophageal Motility Recovery After Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy for Achalasia.
Article in Dysphagia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Abnormalities in the upper esophageal sphincter (UES) in patients with achalasia and the impact of peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) on the UES and esophageal body remain uncertain. To outline the prevalence and nature of UES abnormalities across different achalasia subtypes, as well as evaluate POEM's therapeutic efficacy on UES and esophageal body. A retrospective study of patients diagnosed with achalasia between January 2019 and December 2023 was conducted. POEM was performed on all patients, and preoperative and 6-month postoperative high-resolution esophageal manometry (HREM) data were obtained, along with the Eckardt symptom scores. A total of 64 patients (34 females, 30 males) who underwent POEM for achalasia (type I: 18, type II: 38, type III: 8) during the study period were included. Among the 64 patients, 42 (65.6%) exhibited abnormalities in the UES, as observed on HREM. The majority of those exhibiting abnormalities demonstrated impaired relaxation of the UES (46.9%), followed by a combination of hypertensive basal UES pressure (UESP) and impaired UES relaxation (12.5%). The dysphagia score and Eckardt score before POEM were significantly greater in the UES abnormality group than in the normal UES group (2.3 ± 0.7 vs. 1.9 ± 0.7, p = 0.040 and 6.2 ± 1.8 vs. 5.0 ± 1.6, p = 0.008, respectively). UESP and UES relaxation pressure (UESRP) decreased significantly following POEM across all types of achalasia (p < 0.05). All type I patients continued to exhibit no contractility after undergoing POEM. Pan-esophageal pressurization and spastic contractions were absent in patients with type II and type III achalasia following POEM. The high prevalence of UES abnormalities among patients with achalasia may serve as a compensatory mechanism. Patients with type II and III showed partial recovery of peristalsis following POEM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.