ArticlePediatric cardiology2025
Provider Perceptions of Outcomes in the Pediatric Cardiac Intensive Care Unit.
Article in Pediatric cardiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the pediatric cardiac intensive care unit (PCICU), predicting the complications and long-term impact of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is influenced by the providers' perceptions. Little is understood about such perceptions as they relate to provider role and experience. A multi-disciplinary group in the PCICU of a single center was surveyed regarding two patient scenarios: (1) ECMO after cardiac surgery, and (2) cardiac arrest with need for CPR. Respondents indicated their risk tolerance for potential complications of these interventions, and the impact on patient health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Responses were compared based on providers' role and experience. 101 providers were surveyed and were willing to tolerate a 50% risk of death with ECMO or continued CPR but had less tolerance for the risk of other long-term morbidities. For most potential complications, nurses had the lowest risk tolerance and attending physicians the highest. Provider experience had no impact on risk tolerance. All providers underestimated HRQoL scores compared to previously published scores of patients who survived the surveyed scenarios. This survey is one of the first to explore providers' perceptions of ECMO and CPR. PCICU providers are more willing to accept the risk of death than other morbid complications, and poorly predict HRQoL outcomes. Team members have varied risk tolerance for complications and predict their impact differently. Understanding the variability of and influences on perceptions of patient outcomes could help improve communication with patients and families, team dynamics, and decision-making in the PCICU.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39592504What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.