ArticlePediatric cardiology2025
Percutaneous Device Closure of Perimembranous Ventricular Septal Defects Associated with Aortic Valve Prolapse and Aortic Regurgitation.
Article in Pediatric cardiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The progression of aortic regurgitation (AR) in perimembranous ventricular septal defects (pVSD) remains uncertain; research indicates that the accompanying AR tends to worsen over time. There is controversy surrounding the percutaneous closure of defects in patients with pVSD associated with aortic valve prolapse (AVP) and AR. Our research focused on transcatheter closure for pVSD accompanied by AVP, AR, and septal aneurysm, with the aim of addressing challenges through device placement in aneurysmal tissue to eliminate the Venturi effect. We studied 44 patients with AVP, AR, and septal aneurysm who underwent transcatheter device closure. The mean age and weight were 10.5 ± 4.0 years and 36.0 ± 15.1 kg, respectively. Transcatheter closure was attempted in 44 patients. One case (2.3%) was referred to surgery, while the procedure was successfully completed in 43 out of 44 patients (97.7%). Early complications were minimal. Embolization of the device to the pulmonary artery was observed in one patient; upon re-evaluation, significant aneurysm tissue damage was detected, leading to a referral for surgery. Additionally, three patients (6.9%) developed permanent incomplete right bundle branch block (iRBBB). The median follow-up time was 43 months. During the follow-up period, AR progressed in only 1(2.3%) patient, while AR in 7(16.3%) patients regressed markedly. Follow-up assessments demonstrated high rates of complete occlusion; the rates at immediate, 24 h, 6 months, and 1 year were assessed as 72, 83.7, 93, and 95.3%, respectively. Transcatheter device closure of pVSD offers a minimally invasive, safe, effective, and alternative treatment option for patients with pVSD associated with AVP and AR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39592503What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.