SynthesisActa neurochirurgica2024
Lumbar Disc Herniation and Cauda Equina Syndrome During Pregnancy: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in Acta neurochirurgica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Potential Role of Mast Cells in Intervertebral Disc Ageing, Herniation Resolution, and Degeneration: Evidence and Lessons Learned from Studies of Mast Cells in Other Connective Tissues.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Combined pulse radiofrequency and selective nerve root block for lumbar disc herniation-related neuropathic pain: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Orthopedics in Pregnancy: Exploring Challenges and Solutions.Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences · 2025Article
- Multidisciplinary management of cervical disc herniation in pregnancy: illustrative case.Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionLow back pain is common during pregnancy, affecting up to 76% of women. However, symptomatic lumbar disc herniation (LDH) is rare, occurring in about 1 in 10,000 pregnancies, with less than 2% progressing to cauda equina syndrome (CES). The overlap in symptoms between LDH and typical pregnancy-related conditions complicates both diagnosis and management. This review aims to enhance understanding of LDH and CES during pregnancy and provide a comprehensive overview of treatment options. METHODOLOGY: A systematic review of the PubMed database was conducted following PRISMA guidelines, focusing on patient demographics, clinical presentation, diagnostics, treatment strategies, and outcomes.
resultsThirty-three case reports and series involving 51 pregnant women diagnosed with LDH and CES were analyzed. The average age was 33.2 years, with most symptoms occurring in the third trimester. Lower extremity pain (86.3%) and low back pain (78.4%) were the predominant symptoms, with 49.0% experiencing sphincter involvement. MRI was the primary diagnostic tool, identifying single-level disc herniation in 92.2% of cases. Antepartum spine surgery was performed on 74.5% of the women, predominantly through microdiscectomy, with 79.2% using general anesthesia. Post-surgery, 52.6% had cesarean sections, while 42.1% delivered vaginally. Adverse events were minimal (3.9%), and 62.7% of patients experienced favorable outcomes without neurological deterioration or maternal/fetal deaths.
conclusionAlthough rare, acute LDH and CES during pregnancy require prompt attention and intervention. MRI and emergent surgical treatment are generally safe and effective for both mother and fetus. Special surgical positioning and anesthesia management considerations are critical to minimizing risks and ensuring favorable outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39592477What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.