ArticleStatistics in medicine2024
Quantifying Overdiagnosis for Multicancer Detection Tests: A Novel Method.
Article in Statistics in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Multicancer detection (MCD) tests use blood specimens to detect preclinical cancers. A major concern is overdiagnosis, the detection of preclinical cancer on screening that would not have developed into symptomatic cancer in the absence of screening. Because overdiagnosis can lead to unnecessary and harmful treatments, its quantification is important. A key metric is the screen overdiagnosis fraction (SOF), the probability of overdiagnosis at screen detection. Estimating SOF is notoriously difficult because overdiagnosis is not observed. This estimation is more challenging with MCD tests because short-term results are needed as the technology is rapidly changing. To estimate average SOF for a program of yearly MCD tests, I introduce a novel method that requires at least two yearly MCD tests given to persons having a wide range of ages and applies only to cancers for which there is no conventional screening. The method assumes an exponential distribution for the sojourn time in an operational screen-detectable preclinical cancer (OPC) state, defined as once screen-detectable (positive screen and work-up), always screen-detectable. Because this assumption appears in only one term in the SOF formula, the results are robust to violations of the assumption. An SOF plot graphs average SOF versus mean sojourn time. With lung cancer screening data and synthetic data, SOF plots distinguished small from moderate levels of SOF. With its unique set of assumptions, the SOF plot would complement other modeling approaches for estimating SOF once sufficient short-term observational data on MCD tests become available.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.