Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39592413›Full record

ReviewBiological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society2025

Insect-flower interactions, ecosystem functions, and restoration ecology in the northern Sahel: current knowledge and perspectives.

Natalia Medina-Serrano, Martine Hossaert-McKey, Aly Diallo, Doyle McKey

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Omics landscapes in molecular mechanisms withFood chemistry. Molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Natalia Medina-SerranoCentre d'Ecologie Fonctionnelle et Evolutive, Univ Montpellier, CNRS EPHE, IRD, 1919 route de Mende, Montpellier, 34293, France.
Martine Hossaert-McKeyCentre d'Ecologie Fonctionnelle et Evolutive, Univ Montpellier, CNRS EPHE, IRD, 1919 route de Mende, Montpellier, 34293, France.
Aly DialloLaboratoire d'Agroforesterie et d'Ecologie (LAFE), Université Assane Seck de Ziguinchor (UASZ), Ziguinchor, BP 523, Senegal.
Doyle McKeyCentre d'Ecologie Fonctionnelle et Evolutive, Univ Montpellier, CNRS EPHE, IRD, 1919 route de Mende, Montpellier, 34293, France.

Funding

CNRS Ecology & EnvironmentFondation TotalEnergiesFrench government programmeInstitut écologie et environnementLabex DRIIHMTotal Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Actions for ecological restoration under the Great Green Wall (GGW) initiative in the northern Sahel have been plant focused, paying scant attention to plant-animal interactions that are essential to ecosystem functioning. Calls to accelerate implementation of the GGW make it timely to develop a more solid conceptual foundation for restoration actions. As a step towards this goal, we review what is known in this region about an important class of plant-animal interactions, those between plants and flower-visiting insects. Essential for pollination, floral resources also support insects that play important roles in many other ecosystem processes. Extensive pastoralism is the principal subsistence mode in the region, and while recent analyses downplay the impact of livestock on vegetation dynamics compared to climatic factors, they focus primarily on rangeland productivity, neglecting biodiversity, which is critical for long-term sustainability. We summarise current knowledge on insect-flower interactions, identify information gaps, and suggest research priorities. Most insect-pollinated plants in the region have open-access flowers exploitable by diverse insects, an advantageous strategy in environments with low productivity and seasonal and highly variable rainfall. Other plant species have diverse traits that constrain the range of visitors, and several distinct flower types are represented, some of which have been postulated to match classical "pollination syndromes". As in most ecosystems, bees are among the most important pollinators. The bee fauna is dominated by ground-nesting solitary bees, almost all of which are polylectic. Many non-bee flower visitors also perform various ecosystem services such as decomposition and pest control. Many floral visitors occupy high trophic levels, and are indicators of continued functioning of the food webs on which they depend. The resilience of insect-flower networks in this region largely depends on trees, which flower year-round and are less affected by drought than forbs. However, the limited number of abundant tree species presents a potential fragility. Flowering failure of a crucial "hub" species during exceptionally dry years could jeopardise populations of some flower-visiting insects. Furthermore, across Sahelian drylands, browsers are increasingly predominant over grazers. Although better suited to changing climates, browsers exert more pressure on trees, potentially weakening insect-flower interaction networks. Understanding the separate and combined effects of climate change and land-use change on biotic interactions will be key to building a solid foundation to facilitate effective restoration of Sahelian ecosystems.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesEcosystemFlowersInsectaAnimalsPollinationbiotic interactionsdrylandsFerlo regionflower‐visiting insectsplant–animal interactionsrestorationSahelian ecosystemssemi‐arid savannas

Identifiers

PMID39592413
PMCPMC11885709

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.