Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39592204›Full record

Trial reportAnaesthesia2025

Influence of the type of anaesthesia on acute kidney injury after nephrectomy: a randomised controlled trial.

Soo-Hyuk Yoon, Yoon Jung Kim, Jeong-Hwa Seo, Hanbyeol Lim, Ho-Jin Lee, Cheol Kwak, Won Ho Kim, Hyun-Kyu Yoon

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Anaesthesia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Acute kidney injury in urological conditions.Asian biomedicine : research, reviews and news · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Soo-Hyuk YoonDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Yoon Jung KimDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jeong-Hwa SeoDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Hanbyeol LimDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Ho-Jin LeeDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Cheol KwakDepartment of Urology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Won Ho KimDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Hyun-Kyu YoonDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-5424-3559

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAcute kidney injury develops frequently after nephrectomy, causing increased hospital duration of stay and mortality. Both propofol and volatile anaesthetic agents are thought to have renoprotective effects. We investigated whether the type of maintenance anaesthetic (propofol or desflurane) affected the incidence of acute kidney injury after nephrectomy.

methodsThis single-centre, randomised controlled trial enrolled adult patients with renal cell carcinoma undergoing nephrectomy. In patients allocated to the propofol group, anaesthesia was induced and maintained using a target-controlled infusion of propofol. In patients allocated to the desflurane group, anaesthesia was induced with a bolus of thiopental and maintained with desflurane. Both groups received a target-controlled infusion of remifentanil during surgery. The primary outcome was the incidence of acute kidney injury within 7 postoperative days based on the serum creatinine component of the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes criteria.

resultsWe analysed 317 patients (median (IQR [range]) age 62 (52-70 [26-85] y); 221 (70%) men). Postoperative AKI developed in 79 (25%) patients: 43 (27%) in the propofol group and 36 (23%) in the desflurane group (absolute risk difference (95%CI) 4.6 (-4.9-14.0%), p = 0.347). The severity of kidney injury was stage 1 in 76 patients, stage 2 in two patients and stage 3 in one patient. DISCUSSION: The type of anaesthetic maintenance drug (propofol vs. desflurane) did not affect the incidence of acute kidney injury after nephrectomy. Future research might be better directed towards investigating other potentially modifiable risk factors for postoperative acute kidney injury in this patient population.

Indexed as

Acute Kidney InjuryAnesthetics, IntravenousNephrectomyPostoperative ComplicationsPropofolAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnesthetics, InhalationCarcinoma, Renal CellDesfluraneFemaleHumansIsofluraneKidney NeoplasmsMaleAnesthetics, InhalationAnesthetics, IntravenousDesfluraneIsofluranePropofolacute kidney injurydesfluranenephrectomypostoperative complicationspropofol

Identifiers

PMID39592204

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.