Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39592198›Full record

ArticleBMJ sexual & reproductive health2025

Centring women's voices in contraceptive innovation: building the case for an on-demand, pericoital pill.

GIlda Sedgh, Laura J Frye, Kristina Gemzell-Danielsson, Nathalie Kapp, Kayode Afolabi, Angela A Boateng, Mary Mulombe-Phiri, Sharon Cameron, Kanya Manoj, Kirti Iyengar and 5 more

Abstract readEditorial
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ sexual & reproductive health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

GIlda SedghEvidence & Learning Working Group, Self-Care Trailblazers Group, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Laura J FryeFHI 360, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Kristina Gemzell-DanielssonWomen's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6516-1444
Nathalie KappInternational Planned Parenthood Federation, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9602-3674
Kayode AfolabiIndependent Consultant, Abuja, Nigeria.
Angela A BoatengGhana Health Service, Accra, Ghana.
Mary Mulombe-PhiriReproductive Health Directorate, Government of Malawi Ministry of Health, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Sharon CameronSexual and Reproductive Health, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1168-2276
Kanya ManojChildren's Investment Fund Foundation, London, UK.
Kirti IyengarChildren's Investment Fund Foundation, London, UK.
Abigail Grace WinskellSexual & Reproductive Health, Population Services International, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-7851-0283
Kristen M LittleStrategy & Insights Department, Population Services International, Washington, District of Columbia, USA klittle@psi.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-3261-8078
Susannah GibbsStrategy & Insights Department, Population Services International, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0465-2586
Eden DemiseStrategy & Insights Department, Population Services International, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
Stephen BellIndependent Consultant, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

contraceptive preferencesemergency contraceptionfamily planningnew contraceptive methodson-demand contraceptionpericoital contraceptivereproductive healthscoping reviewsexual agency

Identifiers

PMID39592198
PMCPMC11874264

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.