ArticleAorta (Stamford, Conn.)2024
Experience with Zone 2 Arch Replacement Followed by Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair.
Article in Aorta (Stamford, Conn.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTransverse open aortic arch replacement remains a complex operation. A simplified arch replacement into zone 2, with debranching the head vessels proximally, creates a suitable landing zone for future endovascular repair and is increasing in popularity as of late. Still, limited data exist to assess contemporary rates of morbidity and mortality. Therefore, we aim to evaluate current outcomes for patients who underwent open zone 2 aortic arch replacement.
methodsAll patients who underwent zone 2 arch replacement at a single academic institution from January 2019 to June 2023 were assessed. Indication for operation was either aneurysmal disease (
resultsA total of 142 patients underwent open zone 2 arch replacement. Median cardiopulmonary bypass, cross-clamp, and deep hypothermic circulatory arrest times for the entire cohort were 195, 122, and 36.5 minutes, respectively. Concomitant frozen elephant trunk was performed in 45.1% of the cohort (
conclusionZone 2 arch replacement allows staged repair of the thoracic aorta and readily accommodates future TEVAR therapy. This option for the treatment of the aortic arch can be performed safely in a wide variety of patient pathologies. Given the safety of this operation, cardiac surgeons should utilize this approach more frequently.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.