ArticleThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene2025
Optimizing the Use of SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Rapid Diagnostic Tests for the Timely Detection of and Response to COVID-19 in Schools and Markets in Uganda.
Article in The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Operational Research to Support Rapid Evidence-Based Responses to Outbreaks: Learnings from COVID-19.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The early detection and management of infections is crucial to control epidemics. We evaluated the feasibility and utility of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) antigen rapid diagnostic tests (Ag-RDTs) for the timely detection of and response to coronavirus disease 2019 in high-risk border communities in Uganda. Between May and September 2022, monthly cross-sectional surveys were conducted in 11 schools and two markets in two border districts. Only baseline and end-line testing were also performed in matched control communities. Antigen rapid diagnostic test results and demographic and clinical data were collected, and contacts of patients were traced and tested. All patients were advised to self-isolate, and compliance was assessed on day 5. We enrolled 10,406 participants out of 10,472 screened individuals. The participants had a 1.3% test positivity rate, with schools recording higher, but non-significant, positivity rates than markets (1.4% versus 0.9%; P = 0.149). We tracked 556 contacts, and 536 (96.4%) agreed to test. The test positivity rate was significantly higher among contacts than the index participants (8.8% versus 1.3%; P <0.001). Only 55 (29.7%) of the index participants self-isolated effectively. Settings that received monthly testing had lower end-line positivity rates than controls (0.3% versus 1.4%; P = 0.001). Repeated SARS-CoV-2 Ag-RDT testing is feasible and could reduce SARS-CoV-2 infections. However, the participation in testing may have been enhanced by the compensation provided. Also, isolation was limited, which may reduce the impact of the intervention when rolled out on a large scale. Innovative strategies to increase the isolation of patients could improve the utility of early testing for transmission reduction during epidemics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.