ArticleThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene2025
Implementing SARS-CoV-2 Testing during a Large-Scale Sporting Event in Africa: Lessons Learned from the Africa Football Cup of Nations Tournament in Cameroon.
Article in The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Effectiveness of public health measures and strategies to reduce risk of spread of respiratory pathogens at sporting mass gatherings: systematic literature review.Frontiers in public health · 2026Pooled it
- Operational Research to Support Rapid Evidence-Based Responses to Outbreaks: Learnings from COVID-19.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
During the 33rd Africa Cup of Nations (AFCON) football tournament in Cameroon, organizers and health authorities required a negative SARS-CoV-2 test result <48 hours before entry and provided free SARS-CoV-2 testing and vaccination at stadium and fan zone entrances. We describe the outcomes and implementation of mandatory SARS-CoV-2 testing at fan zones during AFCON. All consenting fan zones attendees were administered an electronic questionnaire capturing exposure factors, COVID-19-like symptoms, and COVID-19 vaccination status, before being tested for SARS-CoV-2 using an antigen rapid diagnostic test (Ag-RDT). Participants testing positive were sampled for confirmatory real-time SARS-CoV-2 polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and sequencing for variant surveillance. The case detection rate was estimated using PCR-confirmed cases, and the challenges were summarized from staff discussions and project/study documentation. In total, 4,820 fan zone attendees (median [interquartile range] age 30 [24-38], 27.7% females) were tested for SARS-CoV-2, including 1,228 (25.5%) fully vaccinated. Of 4,820 participants, 148 (3.1%) had a positive Ag-RDT result, of whom 67 consented to PCR testing and 19 of 64 (29.7%) were confirmed PCR-positive. The case detection rate was 40.1 (95% CI: 24.2-62.7) per 10,000 attendees. The Omicron variant (B.1.1.529) was found in all 11 samples successfully sequenced. The implementation of mandatory SARS-CoV-2 Ag-RDT at fan zone entrances was challenged by high attendance volume just prior to matches, lobbying of economic stakeholders, and inconsistent quality assurance when using test kits. Despite the challenges encountered, implementing mandatory SARS-CoV-2 Ag-RDT at fan zones, was a unique opportunity for SARS-CoV-2 case identification and genomic surveillance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.