ArticleRevista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social2024
[Blood donor infected VHB detected by NAT probable phase in clinical resolution].
Article in Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- [Effectiveness of donor selection in a blood bank].Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In Mexico, the detection of hepatitis B virus (HBV) in blood donors is achieved by screening for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg). However there is still a residual risk of HBV transmission by blood components of donor suffering from occult HBV infection (OBI) or during the window period before seroconversion; in both the antigen expression can be undetectable. Clinical case: A 55 year old female donated whole blood in our blood bank,at health history and physical examination no health risk factors were detected. The whole blood was screened, the NAT assay was reactive therefore is screened by discriminatory assay for specific probes, resulting reactive for HBV. A second sample is tested for Hepatitis B serological markers, the sample was reactive for NAT HBV assay, anti-HB core IgG positive, non reactive HBsAg; these results reject a window period. Five months later a third sample was taken, NAT HBV and HBsAg test results were not reactive. We conclude this was a probable OBI infection or probable phase in clinical resolution for Hepatitis B case. Conclusion: This type of cases demonstrates the need and advantage the availability of sensitive and specific methods for the detection of viral genome or serological markers that increase blood safety for the recipients of whole blood, hematopoietic stem cells and tissues.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.