Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39591461›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2024

Illness (self) management, clinical and functional recovery as determinants of personal recovery in people with severe mental illnesses: A mediation analysis.

Bert-Jan Roosenschoon, Mathijs L Deen, Jaap van Weeghel, Astrid M Kamperman, Cornelis L Mulder

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Bert-Jan RoosenschoonDepartment of Psychiatry, Medical Centre, Epidemiological and Social Psychiatric Research Institute, Erasmus MC University, Rotterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4290-6789
Mathijs L DeenParnassia Academy, Parnassia Psychiatric Institute, Den Haag, Netherlands.
Jaap van WeeghelDepartment of TRANZO, Tilburg School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Tilburg University, Tilburg, Netherlands.
Astrid M KampermanDepartment of Psychiatry, Medical Centre, Epidemiological and Social Psychiatric Research Institute, Erasmus MC University, Rotterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4455-6492
Cornelis L MulderDepartment of Psychiatry, Medical Centre, Epidemiological and Social Psychiatric Research Institute, Erasmus MC University, Rotterdam, Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study analyzed the association between changes over time in illness self-management skills and personal recovery in patients with schizophrenia and other severe mental illnesses and determined the degree to which this association was mediated by changes in clinical and functional recovery. The rationale for the hypothesized directions of association and mediation originated from a recent randomized controlled trial (RCT) on Illness Management and Recovery (IMR), the relations between these concepts suggested in a conceptual framework of IMR, and from the results of three meta-analyses. Moreover, earlier studies indicated the relevance of examining personal recovery as an outcome for people with severe mental illnesses. Outpatient participants' data were used in this RCT (N = 165). Difference scores were constructed for all concepts by subtracting scores measured at baseline (T1) from scores at follow-up measurement (T3). We used mediation analysis to describe pathways between changes in illness management (assessed using the Illness Management and Recovery scale client version) and changes in personal recovery (assessed using the Mental-Health Recovery Measure), mediated by changes in clinical (assessed using the Brief Symptom Inventory) and functional recovery (assessed using the Social Functioning Scale). We applied the baseline data of all concepts as covariates. As inferential tests to determine the significance of the indirect paths, confidence intervals were constructed using bootstrap techniques. The results showed that the improvement in overall illness management was directly associated with improvements in personal recovery (B = .30), and indirectly through improvements in clinical recovery (indirect effect = .13) and functional recovery (indirect effect = .08). The main conclusion is that self-reported illness management appears to be more strongly and directly associated with personal recovery than indirectly via clinical and functional recovery. This analysis supports the relevance of self-management interventions such as IMR for the personal recovery of people with severe mental illnesses.

Indexed as

Mental DisordersRecovery of FunctionSelf-ManagementAdultFemaleHumansMaleMediation AnalysisMiddle AgedSchizophrenia

Identifiers

PMID39591461
PMCPMC11594398

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.