Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39591415›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Exploring strategies for management of in-hospital stroke in Sweden: A qualitative study.

Ilan Ben-Shabat, Kristina Lindvall, Jonatan Salzer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ilan Ben-ShabatDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Neurosciences, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-2211-7528
Kristina LindvallDepartment of Epidemiology and Global Health, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Jonatan SalzerDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Neurosciences, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-9205-0771

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with in-hospital stroke (IHS) are discovered and treated with delays compared to community-onset stroke. This qualitative study explores current routines and clinical practices for IHS in Sweden, aiming to uncover factors influencing management and propose areas for future research and development.

methodsSix physicians in charge of stroke alerts at Swedish hospitals were individually interviewed in video calls. Informants were selected from The Swedish Stroke Register, based on the hospital-specific median processing time for delivering thrombolysis or thrombectomy to IHS patients, stratified by hospital size. Transcribed interviews were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.

resultsThree main themes were developed. The first emphasized the crucial step of discovering IHS and outlined possible workflow pathways, including defining the "key player" with stroke expertise and mandate to proceed with the stroke alert to immediate radiology. Subsequent themes addressed obstacles to optimal practice and suggested clear guidelines for contacting the "key player" to reduce delays, as well as offering IHS education to hospital staff.

conclusionsThis study identified differences in workflows for IHS management across the six included sites. A "key player" emerged as a common denominator, who was called as the initiation of the stroke alert and had mandate to proceed with the alert to immediate radiology. Clear guidelines for contacting the "key player" and increased education about IHS were suggested as possible ways to mitigate delays to activate the stroke alert.

Indexed as

Qualitative ResearchStrokeFemaleHospitalizationHospitalsHumansMaleSwedenThrombectomyThrombolytic TherapyWorkflow

Identifiers

PMID39591415
PMCPMC11594569

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.