ArticleVeterinary sciences2024
Pathology-Based Animal Cancer Registry of Abruzzo and Molise Regions (Central Italy): A Ten-Year Retrospective Study (2014-2023).
Article in Veterinary sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mapping Feline Oncology in Portugal: A National Characterization.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Factors influencing malignant tumor development in cats from a multicenter retrospective study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Multiple malignant primary tumors in dogs: an Italian registry-based epidemiological study.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026Article
- The epidemiological landscape of canine tumors in central Italy: animal cancer registry insights, distribution patterns, and incidence estimates.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026Article
- Distribution of neoplasia in Danish cats: data from the Danish Veterinary Cancer Registry.Journal of feline medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Knowledge, Perceptions, Attitudes, and Practices of Dog and Cat Owners Regarding Skin Tumors: A Cross-Sectional Study.Veterinary sciences · 2025Article
- Prognostic Insights in Feline Mammary Carcinomas: Clinicopathological Factors and the Proposal of a New Staging System.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Comparative epidemiological analysis of tumors of the digestive system in dogs and cats.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Pets have a crucial role in cancer research. Specifically, dogs and cats share the same environment as their owners and thus may serve as sentinels of naturally occurring tumors that are linked to the exposure to environmental hazards. Quantitative comparison of tumor types may reveal unusual cancer frequencies, providing directions for research and generation of hypotheses of cancer causation in a specific area and identification of risk factors. The aim of this study was to describe the data collected by the pathology-based animal cancer registry, managed by Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale dell'Abruzzo e del Molise (IZSAM), during 10 years of activity (2014-2023) and to assess its potential epidemiological relevance. Frequencies of tumor topography and morphology in dogs and cats were described, analyzed and compared. Proportional morbidity ratios (PMRs) were calculated, taking into consideration some potential risk factors such as species, breed, sex, diet and living environment. The database comprises 5311 tumors (n = 4719 in dogs and n = 592 in cats), with a higher prevalence in females (67.3% in dogs and 61.2% in cats). The mean age at the first diagnosis of tumors was similar between sexes and slightly lower in dogs compared to cats. PMRs highlighted certain risk and "protective" factors for the development of tumors in specific topography. The risk of developing tumors of the blood and hematopoietic system (PMR = 0.44; 95% CI: 0.21-0.94), skin and subcutaneous tissues (PMR = 0.70; 95% CI: 0.61-0.80), oral cavity and pharynx (PMR = 0.60; 95% CI: 0.24-0.89), urinary organs (PMR = 0.33; 95% CI: 0.11-0.99) and bones, joints and cartilage (PMR = 0.72; 95% CI: 0.22-0.98) was lower in non-neutered male dogs than in neutered male dogs. Non-spayed female dogs had a greater risk of developing tumors of the mammary gland (PMR = 1.75; 95% CI: 1.57-1.96), female sexual organs (PMR = 2.12; 95% CI: 1.01-4.36) and respiratory system (PMR = 2.25; 95% CI: 1.55-6.74) but less risk for cutaneous and subcutaneous tissue tumors (PMR = 0.44; 95% CI: 0.38-0.51) and blood/hematopoietic system tumors (PMR = 0.47; 95% CI: 0.26-0.85) compared to spayed female dogs. Compared with mixed breed, purebred dogs had a significantly greater risk of developing mammary gland tumors (PMR = 1.36; 95% CI: 1.20-1.54) and lower risk for respiratory (PMR = 0.15; 95% CI: 0.07-0.32), gastrointestinal (PMR = 0.63; 95% CI: 0.34-0.94) and oral (PMR = 0.59; 95% CI: 0.36-0.96) neoplasia. Non-neutered male cats had a lower risk of developing skin and subcutaneous tumors (PMR = 0.68; 95% CI: 0.50-0.92) compared with neutered cats. The risk of developing skin and subcutaneous tissues tumors was higher for dogs and cats that lived mostly outdoor (PMR dogs = 1.21; 95% CI: 1.10-1.33; PMR cats = 1.18; 95% CI: 1.08-1.47), while dogs that live mainly indoor had a greater risk to develop mammary gland tumors (PMR = 0.78; 95% CI: 0.68-0.89). Results described herein highlight the fundamental role of animal cancer registration initiatives. These efforts would contribute to the possibility of conducting multicentric collaborative studies to deepen the knowledge of the epidemiology of tumors in dogs and cats from a comparative perspective, thus fulfilling the One Health approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.