Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39591289›Full record

ArticleTropical medicine and infectious disease2024

Evaluation of Serological Tests for Different Disease Stages of Leptospirosis Infection in Humans.

Virginia C Rodríguez-Rodriguez, Ana María Castro, Ronald Soto-Florez, Luis Urango-Gallego, Alfonso Calderón-Rangel, Piedad Agudelo-Flórez, Fernando P Monroy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tropical medicine and infectious disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Retrospective Molecular Detection and Characterization of PathogenicTropical medicine and infectious disease · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Virginia C Rodríguez-RodriguezGrupo de Investigaciones Microbiológicas y Biomédicas de Córdoba (GIMBIC), Universidad de Córdoba, Córdoba 230002, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0002-0295-4647
Ana María CastroGrupo de Investigaciones Microbiológicas y Biomédicas de Córdoba (GIMBIC), Universidad de Córdoba, Córdoba 230002, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0003-3899-156X
Ronald Soto-FlorezGrupo de Investigaciones Microbiológicas y Biomédicas de Córdoba (GIMBIC), Universidad de Córdoba, Córdoba 230002, Colombia.
Luis Urango-GallegoGrupo de Investigaciones Microbiológicas y Biomédicas de Córdoba (GIMBIC), Universidad de Córdoba, Córdoba 230002, Colombia.
Alfonso Calderón-RangelInstituto de Investigaciones Biológicas del Trópico (IIBT), Universidad de Córdoba, Córdoba 230002, Colombia.
Piedad Agudelo-FlórezCiencias de la Vida y la Salud, Escuela de Graduados, Universidad CES, Medellín 050021, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0002-0002-776X
Fernando P MonroyDepartment of Biological Sciences, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ 86001, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3466-7466

Funding

Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation (MinCiencias) of Colombia Project Number 695
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectivesLeptospirosis is a zoonotic disease that is widely distributed around the world and presents symptoms similar to other febrile illnesses in tropical regions, which complicates clinical diagnosis. This study aimed to evaluate the performance and agreement between serological diagnostic tests for detecting both acute and convalescent human leptospirosis, using the micro agglutination test (MAT) as a reference in an endemic region of the Colombian Caribbean.

methodsA prospective descriptive study was conducted on 275 participants with suspected leptospirosis. Paired serum samples were obtained, and an epidemiological survey was conducted. Using the MAT as the gold standard, we calculated positive and negative predictive values, sensitivity, specificity, and kappa index. A Bayesian latent class model was also used to compare the diagnostic tests.

resultsIn 223 paired serum samples, the sensitivity values for various stages of the disease ranged between 10.8% to 54.1% in the acute and 6.1% to 66.7% during the convalescent phase compared to the MAT. According to the Bayesian model, sensitivity was 9.5% to 75.3% in the acute phase and 5.7% to 85.3% in the convalescent phase. The Kappa value, an indicator of agreement, was moderate for the IgM ELISA in the acute phase (0.553) and substantial in the convalescent phase (0.692).

conclusionsThe MAT was the best confirmatory test in both acute and convalescent phases of leptospirosis. Despite the high specificity of ELISA, 21.62% of participants identified as negative by IgM-ELISA in both phases were subsequently confirmed as positive by the MAT. It is necessary to re-evaluate diagnostic guidelines that do not employ the MAT for confirmation and to enhance the diagnostic and clinical identification of leptospirosis within healthcare institutions and public health laboratories while providing a rapid and reliable test for its implementation.

Indexed as

ColombiaconvalescentdiagnosisELISAMATserologyseroprevalence

Identifiers

PMID39591289
PMCPMC11598099

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.