Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39591189›Full record

ReviewVaccines2024

Engineering

Shubing Tang, Chen Zhao, Xianchao Zhu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Vaccines, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Shubing TangShanghai Reinovax Biologics Co., Ltd., Pudong New District, Shanghai 200135, China.ORCID 0000-0001-6639-0222
Chen ZhaoShanghai Public Health Clinical Center, Fudan University, Shanghai 201058, China.ORCID 0000-0002-0718-7707
Xianchao ZhuShanghai Reinovax Biologics Co., Ltd., Pudong New District, Shanghai 200135, China.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 32070928
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of effective vaccines necessitates a delicate balance between maximizing immunogenicity and minimizing safety concerns. Subunit vaccines, while generally considered safe, often fail to elicit robust and durable immune responses. Nanotechnology presents a promising approach to address this dilemma, enabling subunit antigens to mimic critical aspects of native pathogens, such as nanoscale dimensions, geometry, and highly repetitive antigen display. Various expression systems, including

Indexed as

E. coli-derived nanovaccinesmolecular and protein engineeringreassemblysubunit vaccinesvirus-like particles

Identifiers

PMID39591189
PMCPMC11598912

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.