Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39591183›Full record

ReviewVaccines2024

Beyond Suppression: Peripheral T Cell Responses to Vaccination in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients Undergoing Anti-Tumor-Necrosis-Factor Therapy.

Martin Qui, Ennaliza Salazar

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Vaccines, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Martin QuiDuke-NUS Medical School, Singapore 169857, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0001-5230-3263
Ennaliza SalazarDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore 169608, Singapore.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Alimentary tract inflammation in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is treated by systemically administered drugs that alter fundamental host immune responses. Biologics that target tumor necrosis factor (TNF) are first-line biologics in IBD, used widely for their effectiveness, steroid-sparing quality, and lower cost. While they enable a significant proportion of patients to achieve clinical remission, they carry an increased risk of infection and poor serological responses to vaccination. Conversely, our understanding of adaptive T cell responses in anti-TNF-treated IBD patients remains limited. The introduction of COVID-19 vaccines has prompted research that both challenges and refines our view on immunomodulatory therapy and its potential implications for immunity and protection. Here, we review these emergent findings, evaluate how they shape our understanding of vaccine-induced T cell responses in the context of anti-TNF therapy in IBD, and provide a perspective highlighting the need for a holistic evaluation of both cellular and humoral immunity in this population.

Indexed as

adaptive immunityimmunomodulationinflammatory bowel diseaseT cellTNF

Identifiers

PMID39591183
PMCPMC11599089

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.