ArticleVaccines2024
The Health and Economic Effects of PCV15 and PCV20 During the First Year of Life in the US.
Article in Vaccines, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Higher valency vaccines' impact on antimicrobial resistance rates inEuro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2025Article
- A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Switch to 20-Valent Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine from Lower-Valent Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccines in the French Pediatric Population.Infectious diseases and therapy · 2025Article
- Evaluation of Streptococcus pneumoniae as a cause of acute otitis media in Colombia: A prospective study.PloS one · 2025Article
- PCV20 in pediatric pneumococcal prevention: expanded coverage, remaining challenges.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
(1) Background/Objectives: Two pneumococcal conjugate vaccines, 15-(PCV15) and 20-(PCV20) valent formulations, are routinely recommended for US children in a 3+1 schedule. The first three doses are administered during the first year of life at 2, 4, and 6 months, while a booster dose is given at 12 to 15 months. This study evaluated the health and economic effects of the PCV20 infant series within the first year of life compared to PCV15. (2) Methods: Using a decision-analytic model, we calculated the health and economic effects of introducing PCV15 or PCV20 for five subsequent birth cohorts. Epidemiological data were drawn from peer-reviewed studies and estimates for vaccine effectiveness were extrapolated from established PCV13 effectiveness and PCV7 efficacy studies. Direct medical costs related to the disease treatment were extracted from the literature and inflated to 2024 dollars. (3) Results: Over the course of five years, the implementation of PCV20 vaccination for newborns in the United States, compared to PCV15, is projected to prevent an additional 220 cases of invasive pneumococcal disease, 6542 cases of community-acquired pneumonia, and 112,095 cases of otitis media within the first year of life across five subsequent birth cohorts. This strategy could prevent 66 infant deaths linked to these illnesses and confer extra health gains, amounting to 5058 years of life and 5037 quality-adjusted life years. These prevented cases are estimated to save approximately USD 147 million over 5 years. (4) Conclusions: This study demonstrated that vaccinating with PCV20 during the first 12 months of life compared to PCV15 in the US would yield a substantially greater health and economic return due to the five additional serotypes covered by PCV20.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.