ReviewVaccines2024
Analytical Challenges in Novel Pentavalent Meningococcal Conjugate Vaccine (A, C, Y, W, X).
Review in Vaccines, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Compatibility and Stability of aVaccines · 2025Article
- Prevalence and Risk of Meningococcal Disease or Carriage During Mass Gatherings and Associated Travel: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2025Review
- Further Insights into the Measurement of Free Polysaccharide in Meningococcal Conjugate Vaccines.Vaccines · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Multivalent meningococcal conjugate vaccines are a significant focus for the scientific community in light of the WHO's mission to defeat meningitidis by 2030. Well-known meningococcal vaccines such as MenAfriVac, Nimenrix, Menveo, and MenQuadfi are licensed in various parts of the world and have been successful. Recently, the World Health Organization (WHO) qualified MenFive (meningococcal A, C, Y, W, and X) conjugate vaccine, further enhancing the battery of vaccines against meningitis. The antigenic nature of the current and new serogroups, the selection of carrier proteins, and the optimal formulation of these biomolecules are pivotal parameters for determining whether a biological preparation qualifies as a vaccine candidate. Creating appropriate quality control analytical tools for a complex biological formulation is challenging. A scoping review aims to identify the main challenges and gaps in analyzing multivalent vaccines, especially in the case of novel serogroups, such as X, as the limited literature addresses these analytical challenges. In summary, the similarities in polysaccharide backbones between meningococcal serogroups (C, Y, W sharing a sialic acid backbone and A, X sharing a phosphorous backbone) along with various conjugation chemistries (such as CNBr activation, reductive amination, CDAP, CPIP, thioether bond formation, N-hydroxy succinimide activation, and carbodiimide-mediated coupling) resulting into a wide variety of polysaccharide -protein conjugates. The challenge in analyzing carrier proteins used in conjugation (such as diphtheria toxoid, tetanus toxoid, CRM diphtheria protein, and recombinant CRM) is assessing their purity (whether they are monomeric or polymeric in nature as well as their polydispersity). Additional analytical challenges include the impact of excipients, potential interference from serogroups, selection and establishment of standards, age-dependent behavior of biomolecules indicated by molecular size distributions, and process-driven variations. This article explains the analytical insights gained (polysaccharide content, free saccharide, free proteins, MSD) during the development of the MenFive vaccine and highlights the crucial gaps and challenges in testing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.